On Wednesday, 5 July 2017 at 01:40:49 UTC, Dsby wrote:
Will add in language : @ref @weak?
is it DIP47?
Or in library？
We should be able to do it as library types.
The only case we currently know that might need help from the
compiler, is passing multiple mutable rc/uniq references.
int
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 10:46:38 UTC, Mario Kröplin wrote:
It' not really intended to disallow comparisons between
const(Status) and Status, isn't it?
Sure not, please file a regression.
BTW:
There's a regression: running dmd with option -deps results in
a segmentation fault. We can try
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 07:51:07 UTC, Dsby wrote:
what about DIP1000? Is it default?
We'd definitely mention such a big change in our changelog. At
the moment scope support is still experimental with a couple of
known issues
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:27:33AM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 6/28/2017 7:02 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > I've been seeing occasional linker errors when compiling with
> > -dip1000 that go away when I drop -dip1000. However, I haven't had
>
On 6/28/2017 7:09 PM, Dsby wrote:
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 01:44:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/27/2017 12:51 AM, Dsby wrote:
what about DIP1000? Is it default?
No.
When will it be default? 2.076 or 2.077?
I don't know at the moment. Currently, Phobos doesn't compile with it on
On 6/28/2017 7:02 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I've been seeing occasional linker errors when compiling with -dip1000
that go away when I drop -dip1000. However, I haven't had the time to
reduce the code sufficiently to file a bug. Is this a known issue, or
should I schedule
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:44:10PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 6/27/2017 12:51 AM, Dsby wrote:
> > what about DIP1000? Is it default?
>
> No.
I've been seeing occasional linker errors when compiling with -dip1000
that go away when I drop -dip1000. However, I
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 01:44:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/27/2017 12:51 AM, Dsby wrote:
what about DIP1000? Is it default?
No.
When will it be default? 2.076 or 2.077?
On 6/27/2017 12:51 AM, Dsby wrote:
what about DIP1000? Is it default?
No.
"Deprecation: Comparison between different enumeration types
const(Status) and Status; If this behavior is intended consider
using std.conv.asOriginalType"
It' not really intended to disallow comparisons between
const(Status) and Status, isn't it?
BTW:
There's a regression: running dmd with
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 11:53:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.075.0 release.
This release comes with various phobos additions, a repackaged
std.datetime, configurable Fiber stack guard pages (now also on
Posix), and optional precise scanning for the DATA/TLS segment
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 11:53:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.075.0 release.
This release comes with various phobos additions, a repackaged
std.datetime, configurable Fiber stack guard pages (now also on
Posix), and optional precise scanning for the DATA/TLS segment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
First beta for the 2.075.0 release.
This release comes with various phobos additions, a repackaged
std.datetime, configurable Fiber stack guard pages (now also on
Posix), and optional precise scanning for the DATA/TLS segment (static
data) on
13 matches
Mail list logo
