On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 12:54:07 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 09:26:51 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
.isActive(true)
.build();
```
Good
how would I extend the builder methods?
The builder methods are automatically generated and go up the
inheritance chain
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 09:26:51 UTC, thebluepandabear wrote:
.isActive(true)
.build();
```
Good
how would I extend the builder methods?
The builder methods are automatically generated and go up the
inheritance chain to capture all the fields in your class. (I
assume that you
.isActive(true)
.build();
```
Good
how would I extend the builder methods?
On Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 23:31:36 UTC, Vladimir Marchevsky
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 21:48:40 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
2. Using a constructor with many arguments.
```
A a = new A("Bob", 20, false, true);
```
This approach can construct arguments inline, such as during a
On Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 21:48:40 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
2. Using a constructor with many arguments.
```
A a = new A("Bob", 20, false, true);
```
This approach can construct arguments inline, such as during a
function call, however, the arguments are not labeled, making
it easy to get
https://code.dlang.org/packages/builder
Interacting with many projects that are related to Java, I could
not help notice that a common "Builder API" is not easily
available in D.
What is the problem? When constructing classes, especially those
with lots of data, there are two broad ways of
