I'm testing with the ability to connect to Qt
https://github.com/MGWL/QtE-Qt_for_Dlang_and_Forth
On 1/9/2014 10:38 AM, anthonyb wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 17:56:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 16:15:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Is QtD not good enough?
When I tried it, a while ago, it was completely unusable - random
runtime crashes.
Which i a real
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 21:50:50 UTC, TC wrote:
they lack modern features and portability and if I will be in
position to choose UI framework for multiplatform business app,
I will end up with Qt 5.x for sure.
C++ remains the best tool for that job (Qt 5.x). And
unfortunately, i do not
Am 11.01.2014 14:30, schrieb anthonyb:
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 21:50:50 UTC, TC wrote:
they lack modern features and portability and if I will be in position
to choose UI framework for multiplatform business app, I will end up
with Qt 5.x for sure.
C++ remains the best tool for that job
Le 11/01/2014 18:23, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
Am 11.01.2014 14:30, schrieb anthonyb:
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 21:50:50 UTC, TC wrote:
they lack modern features and portability and if I will be in position
to choose UI framework for multiplatform business app, I will end up
with Qt 5.x for
On 2014-01-10 22:50, TC wrote:
I looked at it and on the first sight it seems as a wrapper around GTK
on linux side and native windows toolkit on windows. In this case I
would probably rather use gtkd directly and hope for fewer problems.
(but both should be tried and decided after that, DWT
On 11.01.2014 19:33, Xavier Bigand wrote:
Le 11/01/2014 18:23, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
Am 11.01.2014 14:30, schrieb anthonyb:
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 21:50:50 UTC, TC wrote:
they lack modern features and portability and if I will be in position
to choose UI framework for multiplatform
Hi Dejan,
GTK is not an option for me mainly because I do not like the way
programs written with appears on the screen. It is a
little...ugly! Qt does a lot better in that field, it also has
(QT) better documentation, better tools etc etc.
This is why I first looked for Qt binding for D.
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 09:54:27 UTC, anthony wrote:
Hi Dejan,
GTK is not an option for me mainly because I do not like the
way programs written with appears on the screen. It is a
little...ugly! Qt does a lot better in that field, it also has
(QT) better documentation, better tools
gtk has a web based backend available.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Rikki Cattermole
alphaglosi...@gmail.comwrote:
... It would have enabled building a GUI app and then very simply
building it for a web as well. Without changing much code. Don't think any
GUI toolkit exists that can do
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 15:02:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
gtk has a web based backend available.
Awesome didn't know that thanks!
Have a look at DWT: https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt
I looked at it and on the first sight it seems as a wrapper
around GTK on linux side and native windows toolkit on windows.
In this case I would probably rather use gtkd directly and hope
for fewer problems. (but both should be
Hi to all here,
(another one here that wants to desperately use D in his work
environment!)
So, I am a C# and C++ guy who is used to high quality tools and
UI libraries. I discovered VisualD and I settled on using it, it
is really awesome!
The only problem that concerns me is the lack of
Oopss...I think I posted on the wrong section of the forum and I
do not see a way to put it on the correct one... :(
Thanks for the (ultra fast) reply!
I has that coming that P/Invoke is the only way, unfortunately.
Are you aware of any other problems using this technique ?
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:58:20 UTC, anthony wrote:
Hi to all here,
(another one here that wants to desperately use D in his work
environment!)
So, I am a C# and C++ guy who is used to high quality tools and
UI libraries. I discovered VisualD and I settled on using it,
it is really
anthony:
The only problem that concerns me is the lack of a UI library
to use with the language. GTK+ is not an option for me. Qt is
but I do not see any way to use it from D.
Is QtD not good enough?
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 16:09:11 UTC, anthony wrote:
Thanks for the (ultra fast) reply!
I has that coming that P/Invoke is the only way, unfortunately.
Are you aware of any other problems using this technique ?
why unfortunately? using this in visual studio allows me debug
both C#/D
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:58:20 UTC, anthony wrote:
Hi to all here,
(another one here that wants to desperately use D in his work
environment!)
So, I am a C# and C++ guy who is used to high quality tools and
UI libraries. I discovered VisualD and I settled on using it,
it is really
QtD does not seem to be actively developed and i want something
that is somewhat future safe, if you can say that about our job!
Hhmm...It sounds interesting! Looking at it right now... Thanks!
You can expose D code as COM objects and use them from C# this
way.
http://dlang.org/dll.html#com
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 16:15:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Is QtD not good enough?
When I tried it, a while ago, it was completely unusable - random
runtime crashes.
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 17:56:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 16:15:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Is QtD not good enough?
When I tried it, a while ago, it was completely unusable -
random runtime crashes.
Which i a real shame...If D was able to access a UI
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:58:20 UTC, anthony wrote:
Hi to all here,
(another one here that wants to desperately use D in his work
environment!)
So, I am a C# and C++ guy who is used to high quality tools and
UI libraries. I discovered VisualD and I settled on using it,
it is really
Which i a real shame...If D was able to access a UI like Qt, it
would give a tremendous push to the language. Not being able to
use easily some UI from D is holding back many people. I think
Qt is the only reason some people prefer C++ even now.
I'm from C# world and this is exactly what will
May I ask why is GtkD not an option? Do not get me wrong, I am
not a GTK advocate, I am myself a FLTK user/developer. However,
GTK would probably be my second choice after FLTK, if I ever
had to chose another GUI toolkit for my
C++ projects.
Look at this comparison: http://bit.ly/KFbLbs
In
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 22:09:14 UTC, tc wrote:
Which i a real shame...If D was able to access a UI like Qt,
it would give a tremendous push to the language. Not being
able to use easily some UI from D is holding back many people.
I think Qt is the only reason some people prefer C++
On 2014-01-09 23:09, tc wrote:
I'm from C# world and this is exactly what will make a huge
difference. Have a nice portable language with a nice portable UI
toolkit.
I would like to learn Qt, but for me C++ is a no go (I'm too much
used to GC world simplicity/productivity).
Have a look at
28 matches
Mail list logo
