On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 17:48:20 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 11:30:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As most of you surely know, DIP 1000, "Scoped Pointers", has
been sitting in the DIP queue with the Draft status for ages
and was significantly out of sync with the
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 11:30:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As most of you surely know, DIP 1000, "Scoped Pointers", has
been sitting in the DIP queue with the Draft status for ages
and was significantly out of sync with the implementation. When
I first took over as DIP Manager, the initial
On Monday, 11 March 2019 at 22:57:33 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 14:24:29 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The implementation supersedes the DIP.
I think the question a lot of people have in mind is "Is there
any plan to formally organize a discussion about the future of
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 14:24:29 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The implementation supersedes the DIP.
I think the question a lot of people have in mind is "Is there
any plan to formally organize a discussion about the future of
scoped pointers?"
More specifically, are you planning a new DIP
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 13:08:34 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
What is it superseded by? Is there another DIP that supersedes
the concept or implementation?
The implementation supersedes the DIP.
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 11:30:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As most of you surely know, DIP 1000, "Scoped Pointers", has
been sitting in the DIP queue with the Draft status for ages
and was significantly out of sync with the implementation. When
I first took over as DIP Manager, the initial
As most of you surely know, DIP 1000, "Scoped Pointers", has been
sitting in the DIP queue with the Draft status for ages and was
significantly out of sync with the implementation. When I first
took over as DIP Manager, the initial plan was to rewrite the DIP
to match the implementation once
