On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:40 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/10/2020 2:48 PM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
> >>> It will still do that, either now... or lat
On 1/10/2020 2:48 PM, Manu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
It will still do that, either now... or later. So, why wait?
Because customers have their own schedules.
Customers update their compilers accor
On 02/01/2020 09:01, Manu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:45 PM Walter Bright via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>>
>> On 1/1/2020 9:53 PM, Manu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
>>> wrote:
DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted wit
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
> > It will still do that, either now... or later. So, why wait?
>
> Because customers have their own schedules.
Customers update their compilers according to their schedules, and
t
On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
It will still do that, either now... or later. So, why wait?
Because customers have their own schedules.
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020 at 02:31:24 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
It will still do that, either now... or later. So, why wait?
Since @safe and shared is all syntactical in nature then all
these problems can be avoided b
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/6/2020 10:17 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Well it was a preview for an unaccepted DIP, so it could have been
> > withdrawn. I guess I have increased confidence now, but it still seems
> > unnecessary to delay.
>
> Prev
On 1/6/2020 10:17 PM, Manu wrote:
Well it was a preview for an unaccepted DIP, so it could have been
withdrawn. I guess I have increased confidence now, but it still seems
unnecessary to delay.
Preview means for accepted DIPs as well when they break existing code.
Don't really have a schedule
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 09:41:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for
those
invalid read/writes! :)
It's already been merged!
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10209
Some really fast work there :-)
N
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:15 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/3/2020 3:41 AM, Manu wrote:
> > We've already had this -preview for quite a while; I have enabled it
> > in an experimental context, but I don't tend to write and deploy code
> > that depends on future-features
On 1/3/2020 3:41 AM, Manu wrote:
We've already had this -preview for quite a while; I have enabled it
in an experimental context, but I don't tend to write and deploy code
that depends on future-features. I stick to the current language when
writing code I intend to share.
Do you have some sense
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 06:40:23 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/1/2020 9:53 PM, Manu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/D
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 11:31 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Okay, although I don't really understand; if we have accepted the
> > feature, but we don't enable the feature... then nobody will use it,
> > and no code will be written that's
On 1/2/2020 11:31 PM, Manu wrote:
Okay, although I don't really understand; if we have accepted the
feature, but we don't enable the feature... then nobody will use it,
and no code will be written that's compatible.
This kinda seems like a future-acceptance?
Nobody enables `-preview`s.
Those wh
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 9:20 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 4:17 AM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:45 PM Walter Bright via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
> >>> Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecati
On 1/2/2020 4:17 AM, Manu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for those
invalid read/writes! :)
It's already been merged!
https://github.com/dlang/dmd
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
> > Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for those
> > invalid read/writes! :)
>
> It's already been merged!
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10209
>
> Some
On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for those
invalid read/writes! :)
It's already been merged!
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10209
Some really fast work there :-)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/1/2020 9:53 PM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
> >>
> >> https://github.com
On 1/1/2020 9:53 PM, Manu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1024.md
This has been a long time coming!
A New Year's present
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1024.md
This has been a long time coming!
DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1024.md
22 matches
Mail list logo
