On 17.03.2010 04:45, Michael Rynn wrote:
The list of std modules is getting a bit too long. Maybe a tree structure
would work. After all it is for a programming language. Another idea
would be to make another root, like dlang. or lang. Having std. in
front of nearly makes it a piece of
Michael Rynn wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:41:25 +1100, Daniel Keep wrote:
BCS wrote:
...
Maybe we need a std.arithmetic.* for all the a little more than just a
number types.
Phobos with subpackages?! Blasphemy! That's what those filthy Tango
heathens do and everyone knows that's just
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:41:25 +1100, Daniel Keep wrote:
BCS wrote:
...
Maybe we need a std.arithmetic.* for all the a little more than just a
number types.
Phobos with subpackages?! Blasphemy! That's what those filthy Tango
heathens do and everyone knows that's just morally WRONG.
Hello Don,
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
I've been working on an arbitrary-precision floating-point module for
a while and have uploaded the source to DSource.
(www.dsource.org/projects/decimal)
It's an implementation of the General Decimal Arithmetic
Specification, Version 1.70, March 2009.
BCS wrote:
...
Maybe we need a std.arithmetic.* for all the a little more than just a
number types.
Phobos with subpackages?! Blasphemy! That's what those filthy Tango
heathens do and everyone knows that's just morally WRONG.
(Yes, I know about std.c.*.)
