"bearophile" wrote in message
news:hnd8hr$1q6...@digitalmars.com...
> Fawzi Mohamed:
>> Yes tango has it, there are a couple of things that are a bit clumsy,
>> due to backward compatibility to previous implementations, but I think
>> that the basic approach is sound:
>
> A nice stack trace is a
Fawzi Mohamed:
> Yes tango has it, there are a couple of things that are a bit clumsy,
> due to backward compatibility to previous implementations, but I think
> that the basic approach is sound:
A nice stack trace is a quite significant improvement when I program in D. It
helps solve problem
On 11-mar-10, at 22:09, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:05:51 -0500, bearophile > wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Also if we get exception stack trace support, then you can
immediately see
everything. It's probably better to focus on that.
OK.
Do you want me to remove th
On 11/03/10 20:28, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If a good debugger existed for dmd, you could determine the location,
but I don't know of any good ones. gdb doesn't do a very good job with D.
-Steve
I've never had a problem with GDB, it's always worked fine for me, for
everything I've used (in
Note to everyone, dmd 2.041 array allocation is broken (inadvertently by
my array append patch). You should not use this release.
Another big problem of the release is operator overloading.
If a good debugger existed for dmd, you could determine the location,
but I don't know of any good ones. gdb doesn't do a very good job with
D.
On Windows cv2pdb + Visual Studio works pretty damn well for me. Can't
compare it to gdb though, since I haven't used that yet.
stacktrace printout, there is a need for such things. But I think
exception tracing is coming, I think Tango already has it.
Tango has it since a long time. Makes me wonder why it hasn't been ported
to druntime, I thought the runtimes are quite similar.
I did use it, ddbg worked good (but always skipped over runtime
functions, which is annoying when you are developing the runtime). I
hope that this problem eventually is solved.
Isn't ddbg totally abandoned?
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:14:36 -0500, grauzone wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If a good debugger existed for dmd, you could determine the location,
but I don't know of any good ones. gdb doesn't do a very good job with
D.
dmd has produced debugging information that makes gdb choke up f
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If a good debugger existed for dmd, you could determine the location,
but I don't know of any good ones. gdb doesn't do a very good job with D.
dmd has produced debugging information that makes gdb choke up for ages.
This makes gdb (and some other utilities that tr
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:05:51 -0500, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Also if we get exception stack trace support, then you can immediately
see
everything. It's probably better to focus on that.
OK.
Do you want me to remove those two bug reports then?
I think they should at lea
Steven Schveighoffer:
> Also if we get exception stack trace support, then you can immediately see
> everything. It's probably better to focus on that.
OK.
Do you want me to remove those two bug reports then?
Bye,
bearophile
Steven Schveighoffer:
> The compiler
> would have to instrument all allocations/calls to the runtime functions
> with line number arguments.
Do you suggest me to mark my bug report as Invalid then?
There's another similar bug report:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3851
Debugge
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:28:36 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:20:38 -0500, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
If you want to use the new release without the bugs, please apply this
patch to druntime:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset?forma
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:20:38 -0500, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
If you want to use the new release without the bugs, please apply this
patch to druntime:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset?format=diff&new=262&old=260&new_path=trunk&old_path=trunk
I have just ad
Steven Schveighoffer:
> If you want to use the new release without the bugs, please apply this
> patch to druntime:
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset?format=diff&new=262&old=260&new_path=trunk&old_path=trunk
I have just added a small bug report, I don't know if this can int
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:54:12 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://f
17 matches
Mail list logo
