/ldc-developers/llvm/releases
Oh, I see. The details are covered in the LDC 1.19.0 release
notes (there's a repo switch):
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.19.0
On Friday, 20 December 2019 at 18:30:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
LLVM upgraded to v9.0.1, incl. experimental AVR backend.
Is that an upstream release? I don't see a 9.0.1 in the LDC LLVM
fork:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/llvm/releases
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:19:43PM +, kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Glad to announce LDC 1.19:
Awesome!! With every release, LDC is becoming more and more my go-to D
compiler. Big thanks to all involved in making this happen!
T
--
A linguistics professor was lecturing to
Glad to announce LDC 1.19:
* Based on D 2.089.1+.
* LLVM upgraded to v9.0.1, incl. experimental AVR backend.
* New experimental prebuilt Android aarch64 package, including
prebuilt x86_64 libs too. The Android armv7a package newly
includes prebuilt i686 libs.
* Slight codegen improvements,
On Sunday, 1 December 2019 at 19:11:53 UTC, Dennis wrote:
I have Visual Studio installed. How do I know which import
libraries are being used?
Then you're most likely NOT using the MS toolchain, since it has
to be explicitly enabled (see README.txt). - It can be verified
by checking the DLL
On Friday, 29 November 2019 at 20:55:10 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.19.
Thanks!
with significant import library additions and changes. So if
you target Windows and don't use the Microsoft toolchain,
please participate in testing to prevent regressions for
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.19.
It's based on yesterday's DMD stable.
The bundled MinGW-based libs of prebuilt Windows packages have
been upgraded to MinGW-w64 v7.0.0, with significant import
library additions and changes. So if you target Windows and don't
use the Microsoft
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 07:57:02 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )
That's the plan anyway; plus this druntime regression most likely
doesn't apply to LDC (atomics are highly compiler-specific).
To catch regressions like this
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 13:36:27 UTC, kinke wrote:
Please file a druntime issue, this is DMD.
Yes.
I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )
Thanks.
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 02:56:31 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
2.089.0 have bug ..
building hunt library error:
/home/travis/dlang/dmd-2.089.0/linux/bin64/../../src/druntime/import/core/atomic.d(293,64):
Error: template core.internal.atomic.atomicCompareExchangeStrongNoResult
cannot deduce
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:50:31 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.19:
* Based on D 2.089.0.
* Slight codegen improvements, incl. a breaking extern(D) ABI
change for Posix x86[_64] targets, and dead branch elimination
for if statements with constant condition
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.19:
* Based on D 2.089.0.
* Slight codegen improvements, incl. a breaking extern(D) ABI
change for Posix x86[_64] targets, and dead branch elimination
for if statements with constant condition (in the hopes of
possibly increasing compilation speed).
12 matches
Mail list logo
