On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 07:57:02 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )
That's the plan anyway; plus this druntime regression most likely
doesn't apply to LDC (atomics are highly compiler-specific).
To catch regressions like this
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 13:36:27 UTC, kinke wrote:
Please file a druntime issue, this is DMD.
Yes.
I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )
Thanks.
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 02:56:31 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
2.089.0 have bug ..
building hunt library error:
/home/travis/dlang/dmd-2.089.0/linux/bin64/../../src/druntime/import/core/atomic.d(293,64):
Error: template core.internal.atomic.atomicCompareExchangeStrongNoResult
cannot deduce
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:50:31 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.19:
* Based on D 2.089.0.
* Slight codegen improvements, incl. a breaking extern(D) ABI
change for Posix x86[_64] targets, and dead branch elimination
for if statements with constant condition
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.19:
* Based on D 2.089.0.
* Slight codegen improvements, incl. a breaking extern(D) ABI
change for Posix x86[_64] targets, and dead branch elimination
for if statements with constant condition (in the hopes of
possibly increasing compilation speed).
