On 04/09/14 21:50, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
El 03/09/14 a les 08:10, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
I only chose Debian because it's a stable/old system with a high chance of
being binary compatible with other distributions.
On Debian 7.6 64-bit I
On 05/09/14 00:30, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Then again, I'm not sure that should matter if you're manually running
dvm use
Yes it will matter. It's the DVM bash function that makes everything
work with the PATH variable.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 04/09/14 22:51, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Debian testing (mate desktop) without ~/.dvm dir, dmd still not found:
$ dvm install dvm
$ dvm install 2.065.0
Fetching: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
[] 50581/49347 KB
On 05/09/14 01:02, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
GNU bash, version 4.3.24(1)-release (i586-pc-linux-gnu)
You can validate the installation by running:
$ type dvm | head -n 1
It should print dvm is a function. If it doesn't, dvm is not installed
correctly.
--
/Jacob
On 04/09/14 21:53, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Sorry, i forget to mention that on Debian testing, my desktop is Mate
http://mate-desktop.org/
Actually, I'm using Mate as well. Perhaps that's the issue.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 5 September 2014 at 06:26:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 04/09/14 21:53, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Sorry, i forget to mention that on Debian testing, my desktop
is Mate http://mate-desktop.org/
Actually, I'm using Mate as well. Perhaps that's the issue.
On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 18:24:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-09-04 10:40, Chris wrote:
Weird, I did try the zero at the end (as described on the
homepage*),
yet I got an error. Maybe I typed a comma instead of a .
without
realizing it. However, I'm almost sure I didn't type
On 05/09/14 10:27, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday, 5 September 2014 at 06:26:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 04/09/14 21:53, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Sorry, i forget to mention that on Debian testing, my desktop is Mate
http://mate-desktop.org/
Actually,
On 05/09/14 11:32, Chris wrote:
Chances are I did, yeah. It's hard to remember later what I typed
exactly once the shell is closed. Would there be a way to download the
latest version by default, if the user types install 2.066 or just
install [dmd]?
Just run dvm install -l and it will
On 03/09/14 17:55, Chris wrote:
Methinks DVM doesn't get it right. 2.065.zip is available here:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
(cf. http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ebvumaoniuukgjbow...@forum.dlang.org)
But DVM tries to access it via http:
Fetching:
On 03/09/14 21:58, Sean Kelly wrote:
For what it's worth, if you do dvm install 2.065.0 it will find
it. Not sure if DVM should try alternates or not though.
I've seen this mistake several times, missing the extra zero at the end.
Perhaps adding a special case for that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 06:06:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 03/09/14 21:58, Sean Kelly wrote:
For what it's worth, if you do dvm install 2.065.0 it will
find
it. Not sure if DVM should try alternates or not though.
I've seen this mistake several times, missing the extra zero at
On 2014-09-04 10:40, Chris wrote:
Weird, I did try the zero at the end (as described on the homepage*),
yet I got an error. Maybe I typed a comma instead of a . without
realizing it. However, I'm almost sure I didn't type the zero when
installing 2.066 and I got the right version.
DVM just
El 03/09/14 a les 08:10, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
I only chose Debian because it's a stable/old system with a high chance of
being binary compatible with other distributions.
On Debian 7.6 64-bit I got this error:
$ dvm
dvm: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6:
Sorry, i forget to mention that on Debian testing, my desktop is Mate
http://mate-desktop.org/
Regards,
--
Jordi Sayol
On 9/4/2014 3:50 PM, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Debian testing:
$ dvm install 2.065.0
Fetching: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
[] 50581/49347 KB
Installing: dmd-2.065.0
An unknown error occurred:
El 04/09/14 a les 22:17, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
What I'm doing wrong?
dvm install dvm
On Debian testing (mate desktop) without ~/.dvm dir, dmd still not found:
$ dvm install dvm
$ dvm install 2.065.0
Fetching: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
On 9/4/2014 4:51 PM, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
El 04/09/14 a les 22:17, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
What I'm doing wrong?
dvm install dvm
On Debian testing (mate desktop) without ~/.dvm dir, dmd still not found:
$ dvm install dvm
$ dvm
El 05/09/14 a les 00:30, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
On 9/4/2014 4:51 PM, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
El 04/09/14 a les 22:17, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce ha
escrit:
What I'm doing wrong?
dvm install dvm
On Debian testing (mate
On 02/09/14 22:05, eles wrote:
Thank you. I see that you provide packages for Debian (albeit they are
BIN files). Would it be a huge effort to add DVM to this repository of D?:
I have no idea. Linux is not my main platform. I only chose Debian
because it's a stable/old system with a high
On 03/09/14 11:08, Chris wrote:
If I install dmd 2.066 with dvm, it won't overwrite or change anything?
No, the whole idea is to have multiple compilers installed simultaneous.
I'll soon be moving my code from 2.065 to 2.066, but I want to keep
2.065 around for a while to maintain existing
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 13:10:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 03/09/14 11:08, Chris wrote:
If I install dmd 2.066 with dvm, it won't overwrite or change
anything?
No, the whole idea is to have multiple compilers installed
simultaneous.
I'll soon be moving my code from 2.065 to
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 13:18:50 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 13:10:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 03/09/14 11:08, Chris wrote:
If I install dmd 2.066 with dvm, it won't overwrite or change
anything?
No, the whole idea is to have multiple compilers
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 15:55:47 UTC, Chris wrote:
Methinks DVM doesn't get it right. 2.065.zip is available here:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
(cf.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ebvumaoniuukgjbow...@forum.dlang.org)
But DVM tries to access it via http:
Fetching:
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 19:02:05 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 15:55:47 UTC, Chris wrote:
Methinks DVM doesn't get it right. 2.065.zip is available here:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
(cf.
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 19:34:26 UTC, Chris wrote:
I know, but I thought maybe DVM tries different addresses, if
one is not working. Anyway it should be on
dlang.org/changelog.html.
For what it's worth, if you do dvm install 2.065.0 it will find
it. Not sure if DVM should try
On 9/2/2014 3:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I just released a new version of DVM, 0.4.3.
[...]
Version 0.4.3
New/Changed Features
* Add support for Dub
* Since issue 23 has been fixed this means that now both 32 and
64bit libraries are supported simultaneously
Bugs Fixed
* Fix
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 20:05:21 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 19:46:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
That would indeed make install even easier.
And, especially, updates.
28 matches
Mail list logo
