On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 23:49:20 UTC, Meta wrote:
Congratulations and thank you for your hard work.
Most prominently scope classes work again in @safe code
I haven't been following too closely. Does this mean that
DIP1000 has been implemented and is behind a feature switch, or
is t
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 01:47:17 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Can it be that freebsd64 dub is linked against wrong phobos? I
get:
Shared object "libphobos2.so.0.71" not found, reuired by "dub".
The same was with 2.072.1.
It should be statically linked against phobos, please file a bug
rep
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 01:47:17 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Can it be that freebsd64 dub is linked against wrong phobos? I
get:
Shared object "libphobos2.so.0.71" not found, reuired by "dub".
The same was with 2.072.1.
I saw same problem with 2.072.1 on FreeBSD amd64. I just compiled
du
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 21:28:43 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.072.2.
http://dlang.org/download.html
This version resolves a number of regressions and bugs in the
2.072.1 release. Most prominently scope classes work again in
@safe code, various rdmd bugs were fixed, a
On 12/31/2016 3:49 PM, Meta wrote:
Does this mean that DIP1000 has been
implemented and is behind a feature switch,
Not until 2.073
Congratulations and thank you for your hard work.
Most prominently scope classes work again in @safe code
I haven't been following too closely. Does this mean that DIP1000
has been implemented and is behind a feature switch, or is the
above entry just a small related bugfix?
Glad to announce D 2.072.2.
http://dlang.org/download.html
This version resolves a number of regressions and bugs in the 2.072.1
release. Most prominently scope classes work again in @safe code,
various rdmd bugs were fixed, and -fPIC became default for all linux
64-bit binaries and packages in o
