On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:12:19 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
Hi all.
Lurking in this forum I had the feeling that lots of D
developers tend to rewrite lots of code that could be found in
libraries. This is not bad per se but I thought that one of the
reason could have been the current
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 21:24:57 UTC, user1234 wrote:
"" to each url, e.g
click page 10:
http://code.dlang.org/?sort=updated==180=20
then gotta to change it by hand to:
http://code.dlang.org/?sort=updated==180=20
The query parameter is a hidden dev preview, meant to wait a
little
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 20:22:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry
really needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside
can be found easily. (like: Number of
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really
needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be
found easily. (like: Number of Github stars, number of
downloads, number of developers and in the
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being
done
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:12:19 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
For this reason I have edited a list of libraries that could
aid in this process.
I also considered that the following features could be of
importance to you:
- License
- Garbage collector
- last modification (automated)
On 07/11/2017 5:54 AM, Fra Mecca wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 04:27:13 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 07/11/2017 12:35 AM, Fra Mecca wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
[...]
Can we make a proposal for a change?
Sure ya can. Especially
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 04:27:13 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 07/11/2017 12:35 AM, Fra Mecca wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin
Tschierschke wrote:
[...]
Can we make a proposal for a change?
Sure ya can. Especially if it comes with a PR ;)
If I only had
On 06/11/2017 4:59 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really needs
more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be found easily.
(like: Number of Github stars, number of
On 07/11/2017 12:35 AM, Fra Mecca wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really needs
more and better filters, so that the
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really
needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be
found easily. (like:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being
done
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:59:52 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry
really needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside
can be found easily. (like: Number of Github
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really
needs more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be
found easily. (like: Number of Github stars, number of
downloads, number of developers and in
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being done
to http://code.dlang.org/
I hope Martin, Seb, and others that are
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 12:11:39 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
I checked README.md in this repo. Not sure why my nick is used
in place of name of lnk library.
Also inilike has nothing to do with argv.
Thank you, corrected
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 11:26:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
DWT is using the EPL, Eclipse Public License, license.
I'm missing the ddb [1] and mysql-native [2] database libraries.
There are many list like this for other languages, they're
usually called "awesome-" where is the
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:12:19 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
I checked README.md in this repo. Not sure why my nick is used in
place of name of lnk library.
Also inilike has nothing to do with argv.
On 2017-11-04 01:12, Fra Mecca wrote:
Hi all.
Lurking in this forum I had the feeling that lots of D developers tend
to rewrite lots of code that could be found in libraries. This is not
bad per se but I thought that one of the reason could have been the
current process of library discovery.
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This effort should be combined with the current work being done
to http://code.dlang.org/
I'd like to see code.dlang.org to have a new column that
explicitely shows the licence being used, and the capacity to
search/filter by
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being done
to http://code.dlang.org/
See also:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being done to
http://code.dlang.org/
I hope Martin, Seb, and others that are involved will see this thread.
(Yes, I'm pinging them. :) )
Ali
Hi all.
Lurking in this forum I had the feeling that lots of D developers
tend to rewrite lots of code that could be found in libraries.
This is not bad per se but I thought that one of the reason could
have been the current process of library discovery.
For this reason I have edited a list
23 matches
Mail list logo
