Starting Formal Review of std.process

2013-04-04 Thread Jesse Phillips
The changes for std.process are under review at: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfder...@forum.dlang.org std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a complete change to the API. The original API remains but these will be going through deprecation. The major change

Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process

2013-04-09 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: The changes for std.process are under review at: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfder...@forum.dlang.org std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a complete change to the API. The original API remai

Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process

2013-04-11 Thread Rory McGuire
Hi Jesse, Is there any example code that uses it? On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote: > On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: > >> The changes for std.process are under review at: >> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/**gclsbrghhjitnfderoos@forum.**dlang.o

Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process

2013-04-11 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 at 08:27:24 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: Hi Jesse, Is there any example code that uses it? The docs provide examples http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process.html is there something insufficient about them?