http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
On 4/11/12, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
>
> Andrei
>
Cool talk! And it just occurred to me that you can actually use a
static assert on a return type in D, e.g.:
import std.traits;
import std.algorithm;
auto min(T1, T2)(T1 t
Le 11/04/2012 18:23, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Great talk ! I am going to start to feel at ease with those
is(typeof(...)) constructs ! :)
Olivier
Le 11/04/2012 18:23, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
You didn't used the new syntax for closures :'(
But nice talk. BTW, it seemed strange to me that you mentioned AST
manipulation when talking about mixin, when you d
On 4/11/12 11:23 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Destroy on reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s4qul/infoq_generic_programming_galore_using_d_video/
Andrei
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:34:11 +0200, Olivier Pisano
wrote:
Le 11/04/2012 18:23, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Great talk ! I am going to start to feel at ease with those
is(typeof(...)) constructs ! :)
Olivier
On Wednesday, 11 April 2012 at 16:23:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Also on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3829871
Andrej Mitrovic:
it just occurred to me that you can actually use a static
assert on a return type in D, e.g.:
import std.traits;
import std.algorithm;
auto min(T1, T2)(T1 t1, T2 t2)
{
return t1; // e.g. implementation bug
static assert(is(typeof(return) == CommonType!(T1, T2)));
}
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
It was a quite good talk.
Slide 13: very good, I am asking for min([1, 3, 5)) for a lot of
time :-) (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4705 ).
I hope to see those new min/max/argMin/argMa
Question on slide #6:
"Should work at efficiency comparable to hand-written code"
A version of min() that used 'ref' would probably be faster on large
structs. Is that a problem? How do you make the decision to exclude
'ref'? Do [generic] algorithms always go with value semantics?
On Wed, Apr
On 2012-04-11 18:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Nice talk. I noted a minor error in the slides. On several occasions you
check for the "<" operator but then uses the ">" operator in the actual
body of the function/t
11.04.2012 20:23, Andrei Alexandrescu написал:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
27:17
It's valid to pass an empty list. Compilation will fail when T.length =
1 for 'x[1]'.
Andrei is really looking embarrassed telling this like if he knows it's
a
On 04/11/2012 11:28 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 18:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Nice talk. I noted a minor error in the slides. On several occasions you
> check for the "<" operator but then u
On 4/16/12 10:00 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
11.04.2012 20:23, Andrei Alexandrescu написал:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
27:17
It's valid to pass an empty list. Compilation will fail when T.length =
1 for 'x[1]'.
Andrei is really looking emba
17.04.2012 7:55, Andrei Alexandrescu написал:
On 4/16/12 10:00 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
11.04.2012 20:23, Andrei Alexandrescu написал:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
27:17
It's valid to pass an empty list. Compilation will fail when T.length
On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 08:00:36 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
It's pity that a video is read-only and it isn't easy to fix
slips of the tongue like this one. Maybe some notes can be
added?
Anyway, these (Andrei's and Walter's) videos are too good to
not list them on the site.
I've
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 18:41:05 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
I've cleaned up the wiki a bit and added them:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?WhySwitch
And thank you for doing that.
On 4/18/12, SomeDude wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 08:00:36 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
> wrote:
>>
>> It's pity that a video is read-only and it isn't easy to fix
>> slips of the tongue like this one. Maybe some notes can be
>> added?
>>
>> Anyway, these (Andrei's and Walter's) videos are too
19.04.2012 4:11, Andrej Mitrovic написал:
On 4/18/12, SomeDude wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 08:00:36 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
It's pity that a video is read-only and it isn't easy to fix
slips of the tongue like this one. Maybe some notes can be
added?
Anyway, these (Andrei's an
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 09:42:43 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
D wiki is really a maze for me (or I just don't understand
something?). It contains lots of outdated info mixed with some
up-to-date info. I thought that D wiki is only for experienced
D developers who know what is outdated
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 00:11:29 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/18/12, SomeDude wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 08:00:36 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
It's pity that a video is read-only and it isn't easy to fix
slips of the tongue like this one. Maybe some notes can be
added?
A
I like your talk but how did you come to the conclusion that
min(a) does not make sense?
Cheers,
Famous
Famous:
> I like your talk but how did you come to the conclusion that
> min(a) does not make sense?
Do you mean the min of a single item is the item itself? This is right, but
this case is better (more handy) left as function overload to ask for the min
of a single given iterable.
Bye,
bearop
On Monday, 23 April 2012 at 16:45:19 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you mean the min of a single item is the item itself?
Yes.
This is right, but this case is better (more handy) left as
function overload to ask for the min of a single given iterable.
Would this transparantly work for an item an
Famous:
bearophile:
Do you mean the min of a single item is the item itself?
Yes.
This is right, but this case is better (more handy) left as
function overload to ask for the min of a single given
iterable.
Would this transparantly work for an item and a set consisting
of one item?
I
25 matches
Mail list logo
