On 5/9/12, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Sorry, that won't work, the compiler will not allow a Voldemort Type
to be instantiated outside of its scope (the technical reason is it
has no reference
On Wed, 09 May 2012 23:20:47 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-09 23:03, Timon Gehr wrote:
The type cannot be inferred without full semantic analysis in general.
Furthermore, it could be different based on compilation options (or
maybe based on in what order the modules were
Le 09/05/2012 21:23, Bernard Helyer a écrit :
You've been busy! Looks like you've hit your 2 article limit.
Log-in or register for a free account to get unlimited articles and
full access to Dr. Dobb's.
Sorry doctor, but I don't care about that other article that much. My
god, Dr. Dobb's is
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
Le 09/05/2012 16:30, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
I read it.
writeln(take(generator(5), 10)); = writeln(generator(5).take(10));
UFCS FTW !
Great reading BTW, and I love how ti is named.
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 14:30:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
One drawback of Voldemort types, is that they are incompatible
with the generation of .di files (option -H).
See
On May 9, 2012, at 8:43 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Great reading BTW, and I love how ti is named.
I'd prefer Lovecraftian types :-) Good article though.
On Wed, 09 May 2012 08:58:56 -0700, Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 14:30:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
One drawback of Voldemort types, is that they are incompatible
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:05:36 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 08:58:56 -0700, Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 14:30:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
On May 9, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
One thing:
and then use g. I know what you're thinking — use typeof and declare another
instance of RandomNumberGenerator:
auto g = generator(4);
typeof(g) h;
On Wed, 09 May 2012 10:19:08 -0700, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:05:36 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 08:58:56 -0700, Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 14:30:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:41:31 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 10:19:08 -0700, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:05:36 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 08:58:56 -0700, Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9
On Wed, 09 May 2012 11:00:01 -0700, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:41:31 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 10:19:08 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:05:36 Adam Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 09 May
You've been busy! Looks like you've hit your 2 article limit.
Log-in or register for a free account to get unlimited articles
and full access to Dr. Dobb's.
Sorry doctor, but I don't care about that other article that
much. My god, Dr. Dobb's is such a shit-hole. Walter's articles
are their
On 2012-05-09 20:54, Adam Wilson wrote:
Nuts. It's CTFE. Because the implementation source is being stripped
out, that was *THE* main request of DI files and they are pointless
without that.
Essentially DI files and CTFE are mutually exclusive.
No, it's the same issue with templates and
On 2012-05-09 19:05, Adam Wilson wrote:
This pull fixes this problem and a bunch of others:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/928. However, it
currently fails to build on Linux and fails the unittests on Windows
thanks to a problem with the dur template function in
On 2012-05-09 16:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
D also have some problems with voldemort types. As can be seen in a
discussion in the main newsgroup, it's not possible to declare a
function pointer which returns
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 22:11:20 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-09 20:54, Adam Wilson wrote:
Nuts. It's CTFE. Because the implementation source is being stripped
out, that was *THE* main request of DI files and they are pointless
without that.
Essentially DI files and CTFE are
On 05/09/2012 10:09 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-09 19:05, Adam Wilson wrote:
This pull fixes this problem and a bunch of others:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/928. However, it
currently fails to build on Linux and fails the unittests on Windows
thanks to a problem
On 5/9/2012 1:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yeah. You _can_ strip them out (except for templates), but doing so restricts
what you can do (in this case, killing inlining and CTFE). Personally, I think
that it makes .di files essentially useless except in specific cases where you
can't use CTFE
On 5/9/2012 10:11 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
If the struct were made static and given a ctor that seed were passed to, I
imagine it would work, yes?
It should work.
But you'll run into another issue - transmitting that typeof *up* out of its
scope.
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 14:06:10 Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/9/2012 1:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yeah. You _can_ strip them out (except for templates), but doing so
restricts what you can do (in this case, killing inlining and CTFE).
Personally, I think that it makes .di files
22 matches
Mail list logo
