http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
# aammm
Associative arrays with manual memory management
All enries and buckets would be dealocated and disposed by
internal implementation's destructor.
The destructor is called by garbage collector (by default).
Example
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
# aammm
Associative arrays with manual memory management
[...]
Awesome, I was waiting for something like that. Thank you!
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Nice! I'll try this!
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared Mallocator)
When does the third parameter need to be qualified as `shared`?
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators. I'm
especially interested in how much speed we can gain with using a
non-shared BlockAllocator in combination with aammm
On 24-Aug-2015 15:01, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
# aammm
Associative arrays with manual memory management
All enries and buckets would be dealocated and disposed by internal
implementation's destructor.
The destructor is called by garbage collecto
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:41:41 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Nice! I'll try this!
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared Mallocator)
When does the third parameter need to be qualified as `shared`?
Only if you would use a
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:50:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators.
I'm especially interested in how much speed we can gain
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:50:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators.
I'm especially interested in how much speed we can gain
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 06:52:01 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
auto a = AA!(string, int, shared
Mallocator)(Mallocator.instance);
Sure hope a factory to do IFTI is available? So that the
following works:
auto a = aa!(string, int)(Mallocator.instance); // 3rd CT
param is deduc
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 10:48:11 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko >>
auto a = aa!(string, int)(Mallocator.instance); // 3rd CT
highlights
It would be nice to also see an example at
https://github.com/arexeu/aammm
that shows AA-usage in conjunction with some other allocator such
as FreeList and a
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 09:20:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Only if you would use a shared allocator like Mallocator or
GCAllocator.
Are there cases where a non-shared version of Mallocator or
GCAllocator is motivated?
If not could, maybe the shared-ness could be inferred?
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 13:12:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 09:20:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Only if you would use a shared allocator like Mallocator or
GCAllocator.
Are there cases where a non-shared version of Mallocator or
GCAllocator is motivated?
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:21:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It is possible but not so useful, thought.
Why is it not so useful?
`AA!(...).Entry.sizeof` and `AA!(...).Entry.alignof` should be
accessible from user code since v0.0.3 . They can be used to
construct allocators. I will ad
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 12:10:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
highlights
It would be nice to also see an example at
https://github.com/arexeu/aammm
that shows AA-usage in conjunction with some other allocator
such as FreeList and add a note about the performance
improvement this gives.
I
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:24:54 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 14:21:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It is possible but not so useful, thought.
Why is it not so useful?
Because looks like allocators have different additional params,
that dose not related to
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 12:10:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 at 10:48:11 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
>> auto a = aa!(string, int)(Mallocator.instance); // 3rd CT
highlights
It would be nice to also see an example at
https://github.com/arexeu/aammm
that shows AA-usage
16 matches
Mail list logo
