Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-05 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 12:41:41 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: But making changes to the general architecture - be it in the form of adding load-balancing, or more deeply rooted, such as using GIT for storing and distributing the package index - is something that still is definitely desirable

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-05 Thread mork via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 12:41:41 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: The main issue is that there is some kind of GC related memory leak that is hard to debug with the basically non-existent tooling. What a shame for D, how is this possible?

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-05 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am 04.03.2020 um 20:06 schrieb WebFreak001: On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-04 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 3/2/2020 11:17 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what happened on the 26th last month [1]. Wonderful news!

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-04 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what happened on the 26th last month [1]. In addition

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-03 Thread MrSmith via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 3 March 2020 at 08:26:19 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Nope, should be right. At least on my machines, %APPDATA% points to AppData\Roaming, which is the right base folder. My bad, confused %APPDATA% with AppData. It is indeed AppData\Roaming\dub\

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-03 Thread Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what happened on the 26th last month [1]. Sönke,

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-03 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am 02.03.2020 um 23:50 schrieb MrSmith: On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: settings.json is found/needs to be created in %APPDATA%\dub\ on Windows I guess that should be %APPDATA%\Local\dub\ Nope, should be right. At least on my machines, %APPDATA% points to

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-02 Thread MrSmith via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: settings.json is found/needs to be created in %APPDATA%\dub\ on Windows I guess that should be %APPDATA%\Local\dub\

Re: code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-02 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 2 March 2020 at 19:17:59 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what happened on the 26th last month [1]. In addition

code.dlang.org reliability update

2020-03-02 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
As of yesterday, code.dlang.org now points to a more powerful dedicated server that can host the DUB registry without the danger of freezing due to excessive swapping - this is what happened on the 26th last month [1]. In addition to that, the server that previously hosted the registry is now