[Issue 2464] New: Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 Summary: Correct error message causes incorrect error messages Product: D Version: 1.033 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2

[Issue 1856] Outstanding template issues

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1856 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn

[Issue 2306] Scope for dynamic arrays should free memory.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2306 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 20:07 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'd disagree that scope dynamic arrays should be stack allocated. The > int[variableSize] syntax for that is perfectly good, if Walter wants to > i

keywords

Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention? I agree they're useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone. > --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 18:10 --- > Please remember to assign keywords to bug reports. To everybody reading this: > Pl

[Issue 2463] No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2463 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2423 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Issue 2461] Duplicate typedef (with different initializer) in module has wrong value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 2463] New: No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2463 Summary: No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning Product: D Version: 1.036 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Issue 2462] DMD creates a wrong DLL so loading a DLL in the context of another Process via loadlibrary will crash the remote process

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2462 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 07:30 --- I'm trying to load a DLL (written in D with tango) in the context of a remote process. It works fine with Windows System DLLs. So it seems that DMD creates wrong DLL files.

[Issue 2462] New: DMD creates a wrong DLL so loading a DLL in the context of another Process via loadlibrary will crash the remote process

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2462 Summary: DMD creates a wrong DLL so loading a DLL in the context of another Process via loadlibrary will crash the remote process Product: D Version: 1.036 Platform