[Issue 1984] Assertion failure: 'e1->type' on line 1198 in file 'constfold.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 1959] Internal error: eh.c 41

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 1932] dmd internal calling link command error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1932 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

[Issue 1942] ENHANCEMENT: issue 1807 should apply to is-expressions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1942 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --

[Issue 1931] dmd doesn't enforce users to use assert(0) for noreturn func

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1931 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity

[Issue 1914] Array initialisation from const array yeilds memory trample

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 1910] variadic function compilation failure

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1910 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

[Issue 2464] Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 20:37 --- Ah, right. I see that in FuncExp::semantic there's: --- if (global.errors) { if (!fd->type->next) fd->type->next = Type::terror; } --- Which basically says "If t

[Issue 1904] wrong protection lookup for private template functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keywords

[Issue 1903] Template declaration (for mixin) can't be parsed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1903 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

[Issue 2464] Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 20:04 --- re: #2 and #3: Good points, but this issue seems different to me. I understand why the compiler reports extra errors on code that uses a previously undefined variable: char[]

Re: keywords

"Brad Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry, I want to distinguish 'enter' from 'use'. It's obvious that some people enter them. Have you ever searched for bugs with specific key words, or used it for any analysis of existing bugs in any way? Yes. Being

[Issue 424] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0044C37B (too many fixups)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=424 --- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 19:23 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Are you (In reply to comment #17) > > Just got bitten by this one too. Voted! > > > > Unfortunately I think the only real solution for this is a

[Issue 424] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0044C37B (too many fixups)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=424 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 18:53 --- Are you (In reply to comment #17) > Just got bitten by this one too. Voted! > Unfortunately I think the only real solution for this is a new linker. Just out of curiosity,

[Issue 424] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0044C37B (too many fixups)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=424 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 18:26 --- Just got bitten by this one too. Voted! --

[Issue 2464] Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 18:30 --- Currently DMD gives an error type in this cases, which is just an alias to int. It would be nice if it were a type that acted as an int, or anything else, but didn't produce s

[Issue 2464] Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 18:22 --- This isn't a matter of compiler internals being messed up -- this is consistent and, I believe, deliberate behavior. Unusual, but useful once you're used to it. Inserting a d

[Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][]) causes infinite loop / hang

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=929 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Issue 1898] infinite loop when allocate an array of AA

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1898 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

[Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][]) causes infinite loop / hang

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=929 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

Re: keywords

Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > "Brad Roberts" wrote >> Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention? I agree they're >> useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone. > > The problem with them (IMO) is that you have to type them in exactly as they > are defined. >

Re: keywords

"Brad Roberts" wrote > Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention? I agree they're > useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone. The problem with them (IMO) is that you have to type them in exactly as they are defined. Every time I add a keyword (and I do u

[Issue 2464] Correct error message causes incorrect error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #1 fr