http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474
Summary: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly
Product: D
Version: 2.021
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: n
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Stewart Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued,
> or does it only work if the email address it's sent from is registered?
>
> It was probably the right thing to do considering the excessive qu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:43 ---
Sorry, I was far less than clear.
writefln in all cases we use it in now executes with the code path, e.g. when
the code is executed rather than generated. pragma is compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:05 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem
> particularly ambiguous at least to me,
That's because at the momen
"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you paste your comment into bugzilla so we have the discussion
tracked there? Thanks.
Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued,
or does it only work if the email address
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 11:13 ---
>From the names pragma(msg) and pragma(writefln), it isn't clear at all that
one's while compiling and one's while evaluating.
Better would be to name it something like "ctfe
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 11:17 ---
To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem
particularly ambiguous at least to me,
--
Don wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 08:52 ---
I think we need separate notation for this. Generating a compiler message
while compiling a function is conceptually different from generating a compiler
message while evalua
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|spec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
12 matches
Mail list logo