[Issue 2570] Patch for some mistakes in Ddoc comments.

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2570 --- Comment #2 from aziz.ke...@gmail.com 2009-01-12 15:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) Apply the patch using: $ cp patch dmd_root/ && cd dmd_root/ $ patch -p1 < patch I recommend using the patch before the source code changes too mu

[Issue 2583] New: Segfault on invalid foreach argument

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2583 Summary: Segfault on invalid foreach argument Product: D Version: 2.023 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Issue 2582] New: Significantly Increased Compile Times For DWT

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2582 Summary: Significantly Increased Compile Times For DWT Product: D Version: 1.039 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 2557] inconsistent behavior when taking reference to member without instance

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2557 --- Comment #8 from s...@iname.com 2009-01-12 07:15 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Makes sense. Perhaps, another enhancement report should be created with a > request to change typeof(&A.foo) from void function() to void delegate() wi

[Issue 2557] inconsistent behavior when taking reference to member without instance

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2557 --- Comment #7 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-12 04:53 --- Makes sense. Perhaps, another enhancement report should be created with a request to change typeof(&A.foo) from void function() to void delegate() with a dg.ptr being null.

[Issue 1994] Assertion failure: 't->deco' on line 597 in file 'mtype.c'

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1994 htven...@zonnet.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||htven...@zonnet.nl --- Comme

[Issue 2557] inconsistent behavior when taking reference to member without instance

2009-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2557 --- Comment #6 from s...@iname.com 2009-01-12 03:09 --- (In reply to comment #5) > That's a feature! Even if method is not static, it still has a single unique > body. If so, why can't you take its address? http://www.digitalmars.com