[Issue 884] Segfault in recursive template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=884 --- Comment #5 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-24 02:48 --- Created an attachment (id=336) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=336action=view) Patch against DMD2.029 This patch stops Matti's case from segfaulting,

[Issue 884] Segfault in recursive template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=884 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from

[Issue 2884] ICE: Assert: 'template.c', line 3773, 'global.errors'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2884 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pelek...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 2048] DMD crash on CTFE that involves assigning to member variables of void-initialized struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2048 --- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-24 05:25 --- Created an attachment (id=337) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=337action=view) Patch against DMD2.029 Koroskin's patch --

[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302 --- Comment #9 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-24 07:19 --- Here's the link to Stewart's original post. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/31595.html Note that Walter seems to have rejected Stewart's 3rd point,

[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302 --- Comment #8 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-04-24 05:38 --- Isn't it trivial to implement? --- Foo bar(A a, B b, C c) { try{super.inConstract(a,b,c);} catch(Throwable){this.inConstract(a,b,c);} //body super.outContract(result);

[Issue 2886] New: The linker can't handle *.d.obj

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2886 Summary: The linker can't handle *.d.obj Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: link-failure Severity: normal

[Issue 2887] New: Wrong line number reported inside string mixin

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2887 Summary: Wrong line number reported inside string mixin Product: D Version: 1.041 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity:

[Issue 2888] [PATCH] float * 2.0 is unnecessarily slow

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2888 --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-24 15:13 --- Created an attachment (id=338) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=338action=view) Patch against DMD2.029 This will be a useful step towards further

[Issue 2888] New: [PATCH] float * 2.0 is unnecessarily slow

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2888 Summary: [PATCH] float * 2.0 is unnecessarily slow Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: patch, performance Severity:

[Issue 2889] New: Alias this properties don't overload with non-alias this properties.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 Summary: Alias this properties don't overload with non-alias this properties. Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 2890] std.stdio.write family blocks on file lock

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 --- Comment #1 from graham.stj...@internode.on.net 2009-04-24 19:19 --- Created an attachment (id=339) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=339action=view) A test-case This is more complicated than it needs to be,

[Issue 2890] New: std.stdio.write family blocks on file lock

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 Summary: std.stdio.write family blocks on file lock Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 2891] New: druntime's core.sync package not available

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2891 Summary: druntime's core.sync package not available Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 2892] New: Appending U[] to T[] where U : T but U != T yields corrupted results

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2892 Summary: Appending U[] to T[] where U : T but U != T yields corrupted results Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW