[Issue 3057] Add pure annotations to core.stdc.*

2009-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3057 --- Comment #9 from Sobirari Muhomori ma...@pochta.ru 2009-06-11 04:19:22 PDT --- assert(str1!=str2,pwnd); *fixed -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 3057] Add pure annotations to core.stdc.*

2009-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3057 --- Comment #8 from Sobirari Muhomori ma...@pochta.ru 2009-06-11 04:17:10 PDT --- char* str1=obj.str1; const char* str2=obj.str2; auto len1=strlen(str2); str1[0]=0; auto len2=strlen(str2); assert(str1==str2,pwnd); GCC has stricter

[Issue 3062] New: -run compiler switch ignores -I option

2009-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3062 Summary: -run compiler switch ignores -I option Product: D Version: 2.030 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 3062] -run compiler switch ignores -I option

2009-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3062 Frits van Bommel fvbom...@wxs.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3064] New: Invalid array operation accepted, generates bad code

2009-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3064 Summary: Invalid array operation accepted, generates bad code Product: D Version: 1.045 Platform: x86_64 URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/arrays.html OS/Version: Linux

Re: [Issue 3001] Templated types within a mixin not reinstantiated properly for new instantiation

2009-06-11 Thread Christopher Wright
--- Comment #1 from Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi 2009-06-11 09:32:40 PDT --- I'm bumping this to 'blocker' because it's preventing me from using DMD for my project. I think we need clarification on the definition and usage of blocker. I typically would use it to mean

Blockers (was Re: [Issue 3001])

2009-06-11 Thread Matti Niemenmaa
Christopher Wright wrote: --- Comment #1 from Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi 2009-06-11 09:32:40 PDT --- I'm bumping this to 'blocker' because it's preventing me from using DMD for my project. I think we need clarification on the definition and usage of blocker. I

Re: [Issue 3054] New: multithreading GC problem. And Stdio not multithreading safe

2009-06-11 Thread Sean Kelly
What is the expected behavior?