[Issue 2477] Trailing comma in array literal sometimes accepted, sometimes not

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2477 Brian Kropf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brian.kr...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 f

[Issue 3180] Need delegate covariance and contravariance

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 --- Comment #2 from Haruki Shigemori 2009-07-17 16:55:58 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Your contravariance example is not valid, you cannot call foo(B) with an A. > > It should be: > > class V > { > void foo(A); > } > > > ... >

[Issue 1309] sorting arrays of structs is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 1309] sorting arrays of structs is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 Rob Jacques changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandf...@jhu.edu --- Comment #4 from R

[Issue 3188] remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 --- Comment #5 from Kyle Foley 2009-07-17 13:19:31 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Welcome to D. Thank you :) > In the same way, the existence of > opIndexAssign does nothing whatsoever to prevent the compiler from expanding > it > to

[Issue 3188] remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comme

[Issue 3188] remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 --- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon 2009-07-17 12:35:45 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) >> Given that opIndexAssign doesn't occur in your code, removing >> opIndexAssign from the language isn't going to magically make this >> work. > > I

[Issue 3188] remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 --- Comment #2 from Kyle Foley 2009-07-17 12:12:06 PDT --- > Given that opIndexAssign doesn't occur in your code, removing opIndexAssign > from the language isn't going to magically make this work. I don't see why not. "a[1, 1] = 42;" shou

[Issue 3188] remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com Platform|Othe

[Issue 3188] New: remove opIndexAssign from the language

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 Summary: remove opIndexAssign from the language Product: D Version: 2.031 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Co

[Issue 3187] New: Nested foreach over opApply doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3187 Summary: Nested foreach over opApply doesn't work Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2