http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
--- Comment #13 from Stewart G
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231
--- Comment #14 from BCS 2009-08-09 11:59:46 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> @BCS
> That case is indeed illegal, AND handled correctly by my fix.
>
Given that you are willing to redefine the language I have to ask; What is
correctly?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231
--- Comment #15 from BCS 2009-08-09 12:02:15 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> Better beware of hijacking vulnerabilities.
class Foo {}
class Bar
{
int Foo(){}
// this would become a conflict with only an arbitrary resolution
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3238
Summary: Template function reference being made without the
template body being generated
Product: D
Version: 2.031
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3238
--- Comment #1 from Burton Radons 2009-08-09 22:22:42
PDT ---
It turns out that there actually was a problem with the template; oddly enough
the problem was one that causes the compiler to crash, unlike the banal
semantic error here. So hav