[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3381] [tdpl] Incorrect assessment of overriding in triangular-shaped hierarchy

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3381 Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbax...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 2782] Parameter Names Should Be Visible In Function Template Constraints

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2782 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 --- Comment #3 from Travis Boucher boucher.tra...@gmail.com 2009-11-22 08:44:41 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) The OS-specic blocks in the Posix headers are there to ease maintenance. As Walter has said, the alternative would be to have

[Issue 3542] New: Unittest block does not require a closing bracket

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3542 Summary: Unittest block does not require a closing bracket Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 --- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2009-11-22 11:22:00 PST --- OS support beyond Linux and OSX is by submission, since I don't have an install of other OSes to check. Tango is the same way though, unless something has

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 --- Comment #5 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2009-11-22 11:26:29 PST --- Regarding your commends, eol-style should be set for all files in SVN, so if you're working from SVN all that should be handled for you. And please please don't

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 --- Comment #6 from Travis Boucher boucher.tra...@gmail.com 2009-11-22 13:05:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) OS support beyond Linux and OSX is by submission, since I don't have an install of other OSes to check. Tango is the same way

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 --- Comment #7 from Travis Boucher boucher.tra...@gmail.com 2009-11-22 13:09:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) Regarding your commends, eol-style should be set for all files in SVN, so if you're working from SVN all that should be handled

[Issue 3528] FreeBSD patches for druntime.

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3528 Anders F Bj a...@algonet.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@algonet.se ---

[Issue 2254] Size of executable almost triples

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2254 --- Comment #10 from to...@yahoo.com 2009-11-22 13:28:52 PST --- Since I assume this is a long-term bug now that wrapping up D 2 has the main focus, I'll post some tips and tricks. If you are using D 1, you'll probably have better luck with

[Issue 3540] Another DWARF line number fix

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3540 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 3379] [tdpl] Parameter names not visible in the if clause of a template

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3379 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 3433] [tdpl] Comparing structs for equality is not member-by-member

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3433 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3378 --- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-11-22 17:32:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) I guess, why? Why does ++x need to be an lvalue? 1. It's a departure from C. If we do make that departure, we need a good

[Issue 3407] [tdpl] Compiling with -safe -release must keep all bound checks

2009-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407 --- Comment #13 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-11-22 19:21:29 PST --- To me that always looks like a mistake where there are multiple switches someone forgot to put spaces in between. -- Configure issuemail: