http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
--- Comment #12 from Leandro Lucarella 2010-04-22 19:59:57
PDT ---
It looks like all the paperwork is finally done (not confirmed though), and
Mihail is still working on the patch and merge, fixing the stuff that comes
from the review of the p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1079
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3398
--- Comment #2 from Don 2010-04-22 06:28:52 PDT ---
One instance where wrong code is currently generated is in
std.c.windows.winsock.d, in_addr and in6_addr.
My mitigation would break existing code, though, in cases where the
AttribDeclarati
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4111
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-04-22 02:09:06 PDT ---
Aelxx (aelxx at yandex dot ru) suggests:
I'd like MATLAB style more:
foreach (f; linspace (0.0, 1.0, 100))
{...}
here f gets values 0, 0.0101.., 0.0202..., ..., 0.98989...,
Aelxx:
> >foreach(i; 2.1 .. 4.10001) {
> >writeln(typeid(typeof(i))); // Output: double
> >break;
> >}
>
> I'd like MATLAB style more:
> foreach (f; linspace (0.0, 1.0, 100))
> {...}
> here f gets values 0, 0.0101.., 0.0202..., ..., 0.98989..., 1.0
>
> foreach (f; logspace
