http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=190
--- Comment #7 from Brad Roberts 2010-08-31 23:00:44 PDT
---
A recursion limiting patch has been added to bug 4753.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4779
Summary: www.d-programming-language.org "Interfacing to C"
should make clear how to do callbacks
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4778
Summary: www.d-programming-language.org "Interfacing to C" says
"There are no const or volatile type modifiers in D"
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4776
Summary: www.d-programming-language.org links to Phobos 1.0
docs instead of 2.0
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severit
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4777
Summary: www.d-programming-language.org "Language Reference"
has link to "Const and Invariant"
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2613
AdamB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cru...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from AdamB 20
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4261
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-31 18:57:48 PDT ---
What I am saying in bug 3999 is relative to just the case where the enum has a
EnumTag. In this case I prefer the enum to be like a typedef (as the C++0x
"enum class") and re
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3999
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-31 18:38:56 PDT ---
See a discussion here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=116546
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/us
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4775
Summary: No substitution on writef("%%%s", "hi")
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4772
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4774
Summary: Docs: Mixin Templates
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: websites
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|]Rebindable should be |[PATCH] Rebindable should
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
Summary: ]Rebindable should be castable to bool
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3318
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|]Rebindable.get is not |[PATCH]Rebindable.get is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2943
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
--- Comment #5 from Don 2010-08-31 04:37:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > I was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows).
> >
> > I tested 0.165, 1.000, 1.020, 1.0
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4772
Summary: DMD allows "dereferencing" arrays as if it were a
pointer to first element
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #17 from Michel Fortin 2010-08-31
07:27:54 EDT ---
In the event keeping a combined destructor-finalizer is the favored option,
this could be done by repurposing the to-be-deprecated "scope" qualifier.
"scope" could be applied as an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
--- Comment #4 from Stewart Gordon 2010-08-31 04:21:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows).
>
> I tested 0.165, 1.000, 1.020, 1.032, 1.041, 1.050, 1.060
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|regression(D1 only):|"static if" +
|"static if" +
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |normal
--- Comment #3 from Don 2010-08-31 02:43
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2393
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|IFTI regression(D1 only) on |Regression(1.032, D1 only)
|(T:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4738
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4751
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |regression
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.pur
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4751
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Summary|fail_compilation/fail37.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4753
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze 2010-08-31 00:14:49
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The test case compiles with the following patch, without reverting
> r634.
I meant "as expected fails to compile with error message and without segfaul
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4771
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts
27 matches
Mail list logo