[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 --- Comment #7 from Peter Alexander 2010-10-27 23:52:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > All it takes is assigning to a public member variable or a reference to > private > member data, and you can invalidate an invariant. Granted, having a

[Issue 4808] UNEXPECTED OPTLINK TERMINATION AT EIP=0042787B

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4808 --- Comment #2 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-10-27 23:48:08 PDT --- I bet 10 bucks that this will take longer than 6 months to be fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-10-27 22:13:01 PDT --- The problem with that is what if you don't _want_ T.init to pass the invariant? It seems to me that if T.init doesn't pass the invariant, then really, T.init shouldn't be used or

[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-10-27 15:50:46 PDT --- All it takes is assigning to a public member variable or a reference to private member data, and you can invalidate an invariant. Granted, having an invariant with a type where y

[Issue 3263] Cannot use tuple foreach arguments in an array literal

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3263 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 1064] Compile time array literal from a tuple

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1064 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1

[Issue 5126] New: is expression: matched variadic arguments get empty

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5126 Summary: is expression: matched variadic arguments get empty Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity: minor

[Issue 4808] UNEXPECTED OPTLINK TERMINATION AT EIP=0042787B

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4808 S�nke Ludwig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lud...@informatik.uni-luebe

[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co

[Issue 5125] New: Optional function purity/nothrowness

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5125 Summary: Optional function purity/nothrowness Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component

[Issue 4640] nothrow before nested function signature doesn't compile

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4640 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 5058] invariant() should not be called before opAssign()

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5058 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don 2

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #3 from Don 2