http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5133
Shin Fujishiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
Shin Fujishiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4445
Shin Fujishiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #82 from Leandro Lucarella 2010-11-14 19:17:59
PST ---
Maybe you should try with LDC's or GDC's issues trackers, as this is an
implementation detail maybe it gets better reception there (but it would be
hard to get accepted there s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #81 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-14 18:06:05 PST ---
I obsoleted all the patches because they were outdated (too old dmd/Tango
versions). I don't think it's very efficient to make new patches and post them
here (I mean, there are al
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5217
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5217
Summary: Permit static+abstract
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5125
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-14 11:27:06 PST ---
Another idea:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=122087
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cg
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5195
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4712
SHOO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5216
Summary: /+ parsed incorrectly in comments
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516
Max Samukha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #10 f
On Sunday 14 November 2010 01:04:46 Michal Minich wrote:
> There is one question on SO which seems like a serious problem for atomic
> ops.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4165149/compiler-optimization-breaks-
> multi-threaded-code
>
> in short:
>
> shared uint cnt;
> void atomicInc ( )
There is one question on SO which seems like a serious problem for atomic
ops.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4165149/compiler-optimization-breaks-
multi-threaded-code
in short:
shared uint cnt;
void atomicInc ( ) { uint o; while ( !cas( &cnt, o, o + 1 ) ) o = cnt; }
is compile with dmd -
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5164
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #16 from Don 2010-11-13 23:58:35 PST ---
Sorry, missed out a line:
if (e1->op == TOKcat && (e2->op == TOKstring || e2->op == TOKnull)
&& (((CatExp *)e1)->e2->op == TOKstring || ((CatExp *)e1)->e2->op
== TOKnull))
16 matches
Mail list logo