http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4860
--- Comment #7 from Don 2010-11-19 22:16:42 PST ---
That patch was a bit too early in the function. Should be e2ir.c, line 3308.
Still in DelegateExp::toElem().
{
// Get pointer to function out of virtual table
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5244
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #822|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5244
Summary: PATCH: fix use of uninitialised variable in toObj.c
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5243
Summary: dmd -run potentially removes user files
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Comp
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Michal Minich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michal.min...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #22 from Bruno Medeiros 2010-11-19
15:31:03 PST ---
> Yes, like I mentioned, Steven's solution has some limitations.
I meant Stewart (Gordon), not Steven.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #21 from Bruno Medeiros 2010-11-19
15:29:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
>
> > Classes are not like arrays and pointers. These are
> > supposed to be lightweight data types, it's out of place for D
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2056
--- Comment #6 from Bruno Medeiros 2010-11-19
15:20:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > When this bug was submitted, the lines marked with "// Error here" did not
> > compile
>
> So what does the fix for bug 3621, I wonder? (It's for dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5027
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Medeiros 2010-11-19
15:11:32 PST ---
If instead of:
@ghost static int x;
you have:
debug(contracts) static int x;
and "contracts" is said identifier that is only defined in non-release mode,
then the compiler can
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5242
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code, patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5242
Summary: self referencing template constraint crashes compiler
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5240
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 12:10:42 PST ---
A specialized overload/function like this is useful in Phobos even if it's not
faster.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5121
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 10:05:01 PST ---
See:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2180
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4122
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 10:06:24 PST ---
See:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2183
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5103
--- Comment #5 from Nick Treleaven 2010-11-19
09:45:51 PST ---
> It's defined in docsrc/std.ddoc, but not in phobos/std.ddoc
I can confirm that building with docsrc/std.ddoc fixes this bug.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/iss
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5027
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 09:45:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Or alternatively, have the compiler define a debug/version identifier when
> compiled in release mode, and then just use conditional compilation.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5193
chuck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chuck.so...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from chuc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5027
Bruno Medeiros changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdom.pub+deeb...@gmail.com
--- Commen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
Bruno Medeiros changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4966
Bruno Medeiros changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5241
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from nfx...@gma
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5241
--- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-19 08:20:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> At some point, both dmd and Phobos1 added a new member to TypeInfo_Struct:
> m_flags.
Damn, that should be m_align.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5241
Summary: dmd: ABI breakage/regression
Product: D
Version: D1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
SHOO changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zan77...@nifty.com
--- Comment #5 from SHOO 20
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5240
Summary: Faster std.random.uniform() for [0.0, 1.0) range
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 07:14:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> This is a bug in format. Even the partial fix I made for bug 5237, makes
> BigInt
> print correctly, without any change to the BigInt code.
>
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2954
--- Comment #5 from Don 2010-11-19 06:36:06 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The fix still isn't right, as it fails at compile time on line 10.
It works for me. Hmm.
I think this might also be relying on the patch for bug 5218, which I still
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5238
--- Comment #4 from simon 2010-11-19 06:21:24 PST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> With this patch applied on my system, I still fail to pass
> runnable/interpret.d
> with -O, but now a few lines later at 2110:
>
> 2106 int goodfoo3()
> 2107 {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
--- Comment #6 from Lars T. Kyllingstad 2010-11-19
04:35:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Partial fix in svn 2183. This fixes the last 3 cases, not the first one.
> > It would be very straightforward to implem
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
--- Comment #5 from Lars T. Kyllingstad 2010-11-19
04:32:21 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> My guess is that positional parameters will make it more complicated,
> but possibly it's really simple.
Regarding positional parameters, allow me
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
--- Comment #4 from Don 2010-11-19 04:19:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Partial fix in svn 2183. This fixes the last 3 cases, not the first one.
> > It would be very straightforward to implement the first cas
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
Lars T. Kyllingstad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@kyllingen.net
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #2 from Don 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237
--- Comment #1 from Don 2010-11-19 01:25:33 PST ---
Partial fix in svn 2183. This fixes the last 3 cases, not the first one.
It would be very straightforward to implement the first case, but we need to
think if it would really be a sensible des
35 matches
Mail list logo
