[Issue 5293] std.math: Error: shift by -48 is outside the range 0..32

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5293 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #1 from I

[Issue 5293] New: std.math: Error: shift by -48 is outside the range 0..32

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5293 Summary: std.math: Error: shift by -48 is outside the range 0..32 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker

[Issue 5292] New: Associative array with fixed sized array as value issues a Range violation when inserting new value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5292 Summary: Associative array with fixed sized array as value issues a Range violation when inserting new value Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux

[Issue 4172] Improve varargs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4172 --- Comment #14 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2010-11-30 07:50:14 PST --- Should we close this then? Again, for D2 the vararg problem is settled, and I see little reason to put much work on improving D1's varargs only. -- Configure issuemail: htt

[Issue 4224] alias this and opDispatch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4224 --- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-11-30 05:25:15 PST --- *** Issue 4989 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving thi

[Issue 4989] opDispatch not used when alias this is present

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4989 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4224] alias this and opDispatch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4224 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 5286] To avoid a problem with Template syntax

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5286 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-30 05:08:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't agree it is a source of confusion. I don't know anyone who has been > confused by it. Me! I'm the first then. (In reply to comment #2) >

[Issue 4989] opDispatch not used when alias this is present

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4989 Simen Kjaeraas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pelle.mans...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 4224] alias this and opDispatch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4224 Simen Kjaeraas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4172] Improve varargs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4172 --- Comment #13 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-30 01:19:50 PST --- PS: passing a void[]* instead of void* would also allow users to build varargs at on the call site. Backward compatibility with the old way (for D1) can be achieved by naming the

[Issue 4172] Improve varargs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4172 --- Comment #12 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-30 01:09:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > We can revisit this and look into making it more efficient later, but for now > I > just want to get it working. It's about ease of use, not efficienc

[Issue 5291] ref parameter and const/immutable == hole in const system

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5291 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 5286] To avoid a problem with Template syntax

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5286 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 4172] Improve varargs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4172 --- Comment #11 from Fawzi Mohamed 2010-11-30 00:05:15 PST --- This discussion might be relevant http://dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/1042 should the C ABI be used, then one is better off using compile time varargs (maybe using an explici