http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623
--- Comment #9 from David Simcha 2011-02-21 16:12:54 PST ---
Here's another benchmark. This one's designed more to be similar to reasonably
common scientific computing/large allocation intensive use cases with
moderately large overall heap siz
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5638
Summary: Auto-flattening std.range.chain()
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: P
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-21 15:18:58 PST ---
Thank you for adding this bug report/enhancement request, I was going to add it
myself in a day or two :-)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5637
Summary: Anonymous structs/unions should have their own context
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2547
--- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas 2011-02-21 14:36:08
PST ---
*** Issue 3816 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3816
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636
--- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaeraas 2011-02-21 14:27:41
PST ---
Actually, thinking about this some more, I see what is wrong. It is actually
doing:
bool tmp = a[] < b[];
c[] = tmp;
I am not sure about the details of array comparison like that
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636
Summary: Array ops broken for comparisons
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Pri
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4640
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5635
Summary: Code inside 'foreach' cannot modify variable out of
its scope in a template function.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: N
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006
--- Comment #6 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 11:50:21 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> On the other hand, bearophile's 2nd program now result in ICE (at least on Mac
> OS X)
>
> Internal error: ../ztc/machobj.c 1805
Never mind, it ICE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5634
Summary: ICE on Mac OS X when there are multiple 'main's
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4640
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2837
Vladimir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #1 from Vladi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633
Trass3r changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de
--- Comment #1 from Trass3r
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5631
Vladimir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
--- Comment #2 from Trass3r 2011-02-21 10:25:05 PST ---
Yeah, I know it is no requirement.
On the other hand you could also see it as a regression since replace was
CTFE-able before ;)
But I agree, string functions should be available at compi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633
Summary: (constfold.c): pointer is null
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Prio
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
--- Comment #8 from Trass3r 2011-02-21 08:16:16 PST ---
Well, as of 2.052 replace() has moved to std.array and can't be called at
compile-time anymore at all cause of Appender using pointers.
I've opened a new report: http://d.puremagic.com/is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
Summary: replace() not evaluatable at compile-time anymore
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5631
Summary: Large Address Aware
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Optlink
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5626
Masahiro Nakagawa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||repeate...@gmail.com
Assign
28 matches
Mail list logo
