[Issue 5648] dmd command line option list inconsistencies

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5648 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5649] std.conv.parse faulty for floating point with -O -m32

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5649 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com

[Issue 5648] dmd command line option list inconsistencies

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5648 --- Comment #2 from Ali Cehreli acehr...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 06:43:23 PST --- My mistake: I was wrong about -X and -Xffilename. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 5649] std.conv.parse faulty for floating point with -O -m32

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5649 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Issue 5649] std.conv.parse faulty for floating point with -O -m32

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5649 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5081] Pure functions as initializers for immutable structures

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5081 --- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 12:47:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) Michel Fortin also noticed a nice-to-have: if at the call site you know that all the arguments you're feeding the function

[Issue 5650] New: A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 Summary: A RedBlackTree performance problem Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: performance Severity: normal

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 5651] New: Named enum doesn't work with associative arrays

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5651 Summary: Named enum doesn't work with associative arrays Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity:

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 14:24:25 PST --- :O Cannot, I mean *really* cannot believe this, but this was still in my d2 code:

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-24 14:27:34 PST --- The D version runs in about 20.6 seconds, the Java -server version in about 0.49 seconds, and this C++ (GCC 4.5.1 -O3) version in about 0.3 seconds (this is not a fully

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 14:36:47 PST --- Fixed the dcollections custom allocator, time is now consistently .5 seconds. I noticed the phobos version also occasionally dips down to .5 or .6

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 14:40:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) This looks like a GC problem, I wonder if David's recent changes help... I'm going to leave this bug open. We'll see how the thing

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #6 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 14:48:54 PST --- I have a really good suspicion that this has more to do with false pointer problems than GC performance. The only reason I feel this way is because

[Issue 5623] Slow GC with large heaps

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 --- Comment #15 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 17:56:20 PST --- https://github.com/dsimcha/druntime/wiki/Druntime-GC-Optimization-Fork -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 5623] Slow GC with large heaps

2011-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 --- Comment #16 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-24 18:45:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) https://github.com/dsimcha/druntime/wiki/Druntime-GC-Optimization-Fork from that wiki page: Also note that a Tree2 benchmark