[Issue 6452] New: RDMD shouldn't put the compiler in the rsp file

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6452 Summary: RDMD shouldn't put the compiler in the rsp file Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 6452] RDMD shouldn't put the compiler in the rsp file

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6452 simendsjo simend...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simend...@gmail.com

[Issue 6453] New: Allow multiple invariant per struct/class

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6453 Summary: Allow multiple invariant per struct/class Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6454] New: @property doesn't need return type

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6454 Summary: @property doesn't need return type Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6454] @property doesn't need return type

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6454 --- Comment #1 from simendsjo simend...@gmail.com 2011-08-08 03:25:06 PDT --- This also breaks creation of import files. Notice the double @property: // D import file generated from 't.d' struct S { @property @property p() { return true;

[Issue 6455] New: std.string.format doesn't understand positional arguments

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6455 Summary: std.string.format doesn't understand positional arguments Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 4088] opEquals not called on interfaces

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4088 --- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-08-08 05:47:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Issues that need to be resolved: 1. what should happen if this is called with a COM object? Compiler error. 2. how does an

[Issue 6456] New: toString fails with alias this when more than one field present

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6456 Summary: toString fails with alias this when more than one field present Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6457] New: [CTFE] .idup or casting of char[] does not really create a string literal recognizable in 'mixin', which causes a line-less error

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6457 Summary: [CTFE] .idup or casting of char[] does not really create a string literal recognizable in 'mixin', which causes a line-less error Product: D Version: D2

[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #29 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-08 14:48:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #26) If we grow tuple support by adding piecemeal special cases for this and that, without thinking about them more globally, we are liable to build

[Issue 6457] [CTFE] .idup or casting of char[] does not really create a string literal recognizable in 'mixin', which causes a line-less error

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6457 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 6014] rt_finalize Segmentation fault , dmd 2.053 on linux freebsd

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #12 from changlon chang...@gmail.com 2011-08-08 19:46:06 PDT --- I think the bug is not because class cast . in the code i have Token and ASTNode, The Token is struct and ASTNode is class. if I apply them both on heap then it

[Issue 6014] rt_finalize Segmentation fault , dmd 2.053 on linux freebsd

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #13 from changlon chang...@gmail.com 2011-08-08 19:57:26 PDT --- The struct implement with issue test case : http://gool.googlecode.com/files/jade_dtor_bug.tar.bz2 the class implement without issue test case :

[Issue 6457] [CTFE] .idup or casting of char[] does not really create a string literal recognizable in 'mixin', which causes a line-less error

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6457 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 6458] New: Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 Summary: Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char

2011-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-08-08 22:33:20 PDT --- Ah, yes. I forgot that you could assign a single value to every element in an array like that. That being the case, it should just fail to compile given that