[Issue 6518] break inside a static foreach inside a switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6518 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid CC|

[Issue 5980] foreach element of a type tuple of string literals is not implicitly convertible to immutable(char)*

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6615] Implement optimization for downcast to final class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6615 --- Comment #1 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2011-09-06 16:44:26 PDT --- hm, ok. It seems that druntime actually does shortcut and most of the difference boils down to the fact that the druntime function cannot be inlined... -- Configure issuemail: h

[Issue 6615] New: Implement optimization for downcast to final class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6615 Summary: Implement optimization for downcast to final class Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 6614] New: std.traits should have an isFinal template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6614 Summary: std.traits should have an isFinal template Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 6607] critical_.d and critical.c use double check locking the wrong way

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 --- Comment #2 from deadalnix 2011-09-06 14:33:22 PDT --- Actually, even if the compiler do not reorder that, modern CPU can, and this is out of control, unless specific precautions are used. It's even more problematic now that almost everybody

[Issue 6613] New: Can't use empty tuple as default value for variadic template function parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6613 Summary: Can't use empty tuple as default value for variadic template function parameter Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6045 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@invisibleduck.org --- Comment #2 fro

[Issue 4890] GC.collect() deadlocks multithreaded program.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4890 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6607] critical_.d and critical.c use double check locking the wrong way

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-09-07 03:41:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I understand. If doing this is not good, then I suggest to turn this into a > diagnostic enhancement request. So given code like this: > It's probably not wor

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-06 10:22:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This line implies the following > a[]++ => (auto tmp = a[].dup, ++a[], tmp) > > Do we really want it to be this easy to do? I understand. If doin

[Issue 5665] DmdScript Bug, Program.compile is very slow

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5665 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebb

[Issue 6612] New: Associative arrays with associative array keys literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6612 Summary: Associative arrays with associative array keys literals Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-va

[Issue 6611] New: array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 Summary: array[]++ and array[]-- too? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DM

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6610] New: opAssign when copy-ing array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6610 Summary: opAssign when copy-ing array Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: D

[Issue 6377] std.conv.to should check range when changing signedness

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6377 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3813] Bad writeln of arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813 --- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-06 02:31:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Why are we spending our valuable time on this? Because I print tuples often, and I'd like to see this situation improved. See also: http://www.

[Issue 6606] RefCounted doesn't work with unions due to use of format

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 5590] ICE when using .values on enum which is associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Severity|normal

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Severity|normal

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #11 from

[Issue 3267] int delegate() should be implicitly castable to const(int) delegate()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3267 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6608] Tuple field is not escaped

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6608 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6014] rt_finalize Segmentation fault , dmd 2.053 on linux & freebsd

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #16 from Don 2011-09-06 01:24:59 PDT --- *** Issue 5766 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Issue 5766] undefined reference to `_D3std4bind12__ModuleInfoZ'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5766 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Status|RESOLVED

[Issue 6337] [CTFE] ICE when touching member variable of struct during CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6337 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||soy...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Don 2011-0

[Issue 6323] Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Don 2011-09-06 00

[Issue 6584] ICE on large version number/debug level

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6584 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 6323] Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6608] Tuple field is not escaped

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6608 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 6606] RefCounted doesn't work with unions due to use of format

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 201