[Issue 5553] Tables get doubled with the new std.ddoc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5553 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6557] Inplace enum literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6557 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6634] New: std.path.globMatch throws wrong assertion

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6634 Summary: std.path.globMatch throws wrong assertion Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3659 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #10 from Kenji Hara 20

[Issue 6629] std.conv.emplace: enforcement is too weak

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6629 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6631] core.time module constructor runs AFTER main program's module constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6631 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-09-09 05:27:48 PDT --- Note that adding "shared" to the main module constructor doesn't change the situation. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Issue 6635] New: std.conv.emplace: enforcement is too weak

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6635 Summary: std.conv.emplace: enforcement is too weak Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6629] std.conv.emplace: enforcement is too weak

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6629 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from timon.g..

[Issue 6632] toUTFz sometimes does not work with const parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 zeljkog changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeljko@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from zel

[Issue 6632] toUTFz sometimes does not work with const parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 --- Comment #2 from zeljkog 2011-09-09 15:44:55 CEST --- Sorry, it's another issue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6630] Assigning null to class with nested alias this class is misinterpreted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6630 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Ken

[Issue 5252] pure nothrow Rebindable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5252 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-09 07:59:31 PDT --- Maybe this issue was fixed by pure nothrow inference feature. In 2.055, that code can compile. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Issue 6521] writeln(const(tuple)) doesn't show the field values

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6521 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6631] core.time module constructor runs AFTER main program's module constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6631 --- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer 2011-09-09 08:05:25 PDT --- Right, what I was saying though is that all shared ctors are run before all non-shared ones. So it is very surprising that a shared ctor has *not* been run before a non-shar

[Issue 4972] to!() needs a template constraint

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4972 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6636] New: Destructors of static array elements are not called on function parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6636 Summary: Destructors of static array elements are not called on function parameter Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severi

[Issue 6637] New: Postblits of static array elements are not called on function argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6637 Summary: Postblits of static array elements are not called on function argument Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6470] postblits not called on arrays of structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6470 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 3703] static array assignment

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3703 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, patch --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 6636] Destructors of static array elements are not called on function parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6636 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Ken

[Issue 6637] Postblits of static array elements are not called on function argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6637 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Ken

[Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-09 09:36:49 PDT --- After applying my patch, the sample code generates like follows: (output of ddbg in 64-bit Windows 7) c:\d\test.d:1 void main() 00402010: c80center 0xc, 0x0 c:\d\te

[Issue 5252] pure nothrow Rebindable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5252 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6609] std.conv.parse!Integer should consider sign when radix == 10

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6609 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-09 10:40:55 PDT --- Pull 375 does not support `int[$] = [1, 2, 3];`. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-09 11:00:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Pull 375 does not support `int[$] = [1, 2, 3];`. OK. This is expected. Currenly DMD runs code like this (I don't like this, but this is working a

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-09 11:23:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > int[3] arr = [1, 2]; > void main() {} > > I presume Pull 375 lets this kind of code pass, right? ??? Pull 375 rejects statically above code, it is expected b

[Issue 6638] New: Suggestions/error messages for misuses of for/foreach

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6638 Summary: Suggestions/error messages for misuses of for/foreach Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhan

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1114 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Assertion failure: '0' on |Assertion failure: '0' on |li

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-09 11:31:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ??? Pull 375 rejects statically above code, it is expected behavior from this > issue. I see. I suggest you to read the whole thread of bug 3849.

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-09 11:34:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Code like the following is working as designed, so if your patch refuses this > code, then your patch is implementing an enhancement too (it means

[Issue 5888] createKey and getKey in registry.d always use KEY_ALL_ACCESS

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5888 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5290] Static array literals with too few elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5290 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-09 11:52:16 PDT --- See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144210 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?t

[Issue 4374] Required do-while ending semicolon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4374 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Seve

[Issue 5926] D2 shows empty command line on Windows 98 SE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5926 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5 Severity|major

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1114 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Severity|blocker