[Issue 6047] Segfault when struct with three or more ulongs with a toString is passed to format with at least two substitution clauses with -m64.

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6047 --- Comment #5 from Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2011-11-21 07:44:59 PST --- The format string can be blank and this bug will still be triggered. So a slight reduction is: import std.string; struct A { ulong a, b, c; string

[Issue 6576] std.string.format for struct crash on Linux 64bit

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6047] Segfault when struct with three or more ulongs with a toString is passed to format with at least two substitution clauses with -m64.

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6047 --- Comment #6 from Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2011-11-21 07:59:44 PST --- Issue 6576 may be related to this. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 6982] New: immutability isn't respected on array assignment

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6982 Summary: immutability isn't respected on array assignment Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Issue 6982] immutability isn't respected on array assignment

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6982 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6982] immutability isn't respected on array assignment

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6982 --- Comment #2 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-11-21 08:43:41 PST --- Yeah, was a subtle error in reasoning. But what about the assoc. array case? immutable(Bla[string]) _files = [a:1, b:2, c:3]; immutable(Bla)[string] files

[Issue 6983] New: Vararg corrupts string on 64bit

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6983 Summary: Vararg corrupts string on 64bit Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity: blocker

[Issue 6047] Segfault when struct with three or more ulongs with a toString is passed to format with at least two substitution clauses with -m64.

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6047 --- Comment #7 from Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2011-11-21 08:46:34 PST --- I think the root cause of this might be issue 6983. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6576] std.string.format for struct crash on Linux 64bit

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 --- Comment #3 from Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2011-11-21 08:47:00 PST --- I think the root cause of this might be issue 6983. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6758] std.c.stdarg problems with 8 or more integer arguments on x86_64

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6758 Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6982] immutability isn't respected on array assignment

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6982 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 6982] immutability isn't respected on associative array assignment

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6982 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|immutability isn't |immutability isn't

[Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6969 Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Issue 6984] New: CTFE generates a torrent of spurious errors, if there was a previous error

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6984 Summary: CTFE generates a torrent of spurious errors, if there was a previous error Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 6985] New: [CTFE] Non-constant case expressions can't be interpreted

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6985 Summary: [CTFE] Non-constant case expressions can't be interpreted Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6986] New: SortedRange[x..$] fails with unidentified __dollar

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6986 Summary: SortedRange[x..$] fails with unidentified __dollar Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6986] SortedRange[x..$] fails with unidentified __dollar

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6986 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6986] SortedRange[x..$] fails with unidentified __dollar

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6986 --- Comment #2 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2011-11-21 23:06:36 PST --- I'd think the simplest solution would be to do the same rewrite that happens for builtin arrays, i.e. x[p..$] = x.opSlice(p, x.length) Then no opDollar is

[Issue 6986] SortedRange[x..$] fails with unidentified __dollar

2011-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6986 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|DMD |Phobos ---