http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7008
--- Comment #3 from Jerry Quinn 2011-12-11 21:32:49 PST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Being an opaque pointer means that the implementation of associative arrays is
> entirely up to the runtime, not the compiler. The compiler should emit no
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6987
--- Comment #2 from Bernard Helyer 2011-12-11
20:27:59 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/43
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6922
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara 2011-12-11 19:34:35 PST ---
*** Issue 6855 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6855
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7098
Summary: Annoying Forward Reference Error When Compiling
Multiple Files
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: r
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6056
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6953
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6763
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3967
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6872
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #5 from David Simcha 2011-12-11 10:38:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Isn't GC has a flag that says if something may contains pointer or not ?
>
> Why this flag is set when allocation an array of long ?
It's not. If a bit p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
deadalnix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deadal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620
Adam D. Ruppe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||destructiona...@gmail.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #3 from David Simcha 2011-12-11 10:12:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I understand. Thanks for the reply!
>
> (With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the
> workaround: Could GC.malloc/free be used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #2 from Heywood Floyd 2011-12-11 10:01:25 PST
---
I understand. Thanks for the reply!
(With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the
workaround: Could GC.malloc/free be used as well? Also, I assume if a l
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7096
--- Comment #1 from danas.mikelins...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 09:48:47 PST ---
possibly relevant that I used Opera 11.60
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7097
Summary: opDollar doesn't work with slicing
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7096
Summary: statement.html - content does not belong to main
column
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
Summary: GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6872
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2011-12-11 03:38:49 PST ---
Following cases are also rejected.
static assert((shared(inout(const(int)[]))).stringof
== "shared(inout(const(int)[]))");
static assert((shared(inout(const(int)[])[])).stri
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7094
Summary: More initializers than struct fields for static member
creation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: re
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093
Summary: aliased type sometimes isn't resolved
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DM
25 matches
Mail list logo