[Issue 6278] Regression(2.054 beta): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6278 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6278] Regression(2.054 beta): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6278 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |All --- Comment #9 from

[Issue 6278] Regression(2.054 beta): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6278 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|regression |normal ---

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #20 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2012-02-01 00:58:00 PST --- Focus, that's what we lose. 1. There's no real request for cent and ucent. 2. This let's add a filler doing nothing, discuss it ad nauseam, and

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #21 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 20:12:24 EST --- With respect, Andrei, it's my time to waste. A lot more time has been wasted on arguing about it than the 5 minutes it took for me to make a patch that fixed it. 128

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #22 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2012-02-01 01:17:09 PST --- It's great you want to work on this. It's this particular patch that I have difficulty backing: it future proofs code that doesn't exist, for a feature

[Issue 5851] Ambiguous alias this accepted.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5851 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 4041] Error with ref or auto ref return from opOpAssign

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6504] Regression(2.041): str ~ [arr] allows string literal to be modified

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6504 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 4149] refs displayed as pointers in gdb

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4149 --- Comment #14 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com 2012-02-01 02:22:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) It's unrelated to pull 526 which fixed #4180. I'm talking about the comment 2 by Brad: Depends on if gc implies

[Issue 7416] 2.058 regression: fails to instantiate a constrained function template with a nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7416 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 7417] New: One-definition rule for version specification - allow version expressions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7417 Summary: One-definition rule for version specification - allow version expressions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 6681] bogus duplicate union initialization or overlapping initialization errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6681] struct constructor call is converted to struct literal that breaks union initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |All

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #23 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-02-01 04:21:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #20) 2. This let's add a filler doing nothing, discuss it ad nauseam, and consider implement later is an utter waste of time. If someone really

[Issue 3927] array.length++; is an error, but ++array.length compiles

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Issue 2025] Inconsistent rules for instantiating templates with a tuple parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2025 --- Comment #7 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 23:32:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) What has a better match to do with anything? (int) matches the pattern (T) perfectly - no conversion, implicit or explicit. True, (T: int)

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #24 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-02-01 04:36:09 PST --- Moreover, when we finally get the types, there will still be users on older compilers (DM or third-party, possibly commercial), even some on platforms for which an

[Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #25 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 23:44:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) Moreover, when we finally get the types, there will still be users on older compilers (DM or third-party, possibly commercial), even some on

[Issue 2025] Inconsistent rules for instantiating templates with a tuple parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2025 --- Comment #9 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 23:55:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) more specialized == better match. That is how template type deduction works. But there's no (T : int)

[Issue 6681] struct constructor call is converted to struct literal that breaks union initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 --- Comment #5 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-02 00:02:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Not exactly. It's a compiler structural problem: there's no way to specify a struct literal with missing fields. Struct static initializers

[Issue 4241] duplicate union initialization error doesn't give a file location

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4241 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 4241] duplicate union initialization error doesn't give a file location

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4241 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 2025] Inconsistent rules for instantiating templates with a tuple parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2025 --- Comment #10 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-02-01 05:27:34 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) For (T : int) to be preferred over (T), it must return a worse match level for the unspecialized parameter. Currently it will return

[Issue 5684] Extremely show compile times with large tuples with -O -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5684 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6643] Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6643 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2025] Inconsistent rules for instantiating templates with a tuple parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2025 --- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-02-01 06:39:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) No, MATCHconvert means 'match with implicit conversions'. These are the same match levels used for normal function argument matching.

[Issue 783] Cannot use an array w/ const or variable index as new[] size argument.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=783 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 2025] Inconsistent rules for instantiating templates with a tuple parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2025 --- Comment #13 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-02 01:51:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) No, MATCHconvert means 'match with implicit conversions'. These are the same match levels used for normal

[Issue 6681] struct constructor call is converted to struct literal that breaks union initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 --- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-02-01 07:13:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Not exactly. It's a compiler structural problem: there's no way to specify a struct literal with missing fields.

[Issue 1124] inconsistent: calls opCmp(typeof(this) o); but array.sort calls opCmp(Object o)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1457] array extension member syntax confused with local member functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1457 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2344 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbax...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 2307] (D1 only) Cannot use explicitly instantiated template function with array property syntax

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2307 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 2712] error with passing an array slot as another array length to new

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2712 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 783] Cannot use an array w/ const or variable index as new[] size argument.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=783 --- Comment #5 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-02 02:28:52 EST --- *** Issue 2712 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 3221] (D1 only) Can't use property syntax with ufcs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3221 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Issue 3626] alias this prevents appending to array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3626 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3501] (D1 only) is null comparison should be disallowed for fixed-size arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3501 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Issue 5718] Can't demangle symbol defined inside unittest block

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5718 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #5

[Issue 3683] Linker error on certain array expressions when using -release and -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3683 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5592] Previous definition different: __arrayExpSliceMulSliceAddass_d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5592 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eriatark...@gmail.com

[Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 3812] Missing line number for implicit cast of variadic function to array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3812 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3826] init of fixed sized arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3927] array.length++; is an error, but ++array.length compiles

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 6681] struct constructor call is converted to struct literal that breaks union initialization

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 --- Comment #7 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-02 03:38:36 EST --- Ok, I'll take a look at it tomorrow unless you want it. I know there are at least two places it checks for overlapping union initialization, one in expression.c and

[Issue 3389] gdb: using -gc is mandatory but not well documented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3389 --- Comment #4 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-01 11:27:20 PST --- Thats a wrong comparision because neither -g not -ggdb make the compiler fake C++ debug information as C. The -gc flag is a hack to masquerade as C which should not be the default

[Issue 7418] New: Overloading doesn't work with aliases declared inside templates

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7418 Summary: Overloading doesn't work with aliases declared inside templates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 3389] gdb: using -gc is mandatory but not well documented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3389 --- Comment #5 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-01 11:34:57 PST --- GDB already has D specific extensions (demangling and arrays). Using -g makes use of them, -gc does not. There won't be D specific DWARF extensions any time soon. What we wanted

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #21 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-01 11:42:18 PST --- I think it would also make sense to disallow any align(n) value greater than align(16) for 32bit, and possibly align(32) for 64bit platforms. Don't do that. GCC can provide

[Issue 7419] New: [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 Summary: [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 7420] New: Duplicate cannot be read at compile time error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Summary: Duplicate cannot be read at compile time error messages Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 7421] New: std.getopt does not work with shared strings

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7421 Summary: std.getopt does not work with shared strings Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 4729] std.algorithm: strange iota behaviour

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4729 Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@gnuk.net ---

[Issue 7419] [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 6504] Regression(2.041): str ~ [arr] allows string literal to be modified

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6504 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-01 14:05:45 PST --- I found out it causes the seg fault after posting last night. I don't quite understand your suggestion. Do you have a fix that can be pulled? I did try

[Issue 783] Cannot use an array w/ const or variable index as new[] size argument.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=783 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |pull

[Issue 5718] Can't demangle symbol defined inside unittest block

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5718 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7002] std.path needs a isValidFilePath function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7002 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5718] Can't demangle symbol defined inside unittest block

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5718 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-01 14:32:50 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 7001] std.path.baseName and isValidFilename wrong documentation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7001 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6068] std.path has some issues for Windows user

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6068 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6790] buildPath using std.path.curdir segfaults

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6790 --- Comment #6 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2012-02-01 14:41:35 PST --- Have you tried this with DMD 2.057, and if so, are you still experiencing the same problem? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7422] New: Regression(master): ICE with template function and if statement

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7422 Summary: Regression(master): ICE with template function and if statement Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7294] [Regression] No warning when escaping local reference type variables

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7294 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-01 17:23:12 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7294] [Regression] No warning when escaping local reference type variables

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7294 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3686] common type of imaginary and non-imaginary should be complex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3686 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Version|2.038

[Issue 4031] Should be able to access const value-type globals from pure functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4031 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |pull

[Issue 5481] Support deprecated(message)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5481 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |pull --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 3994] Wrong line numbers inside AA/Array initializers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3994 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 977] Wrong line number reported for a missing comma in an array initializer within a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=977 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbkbbej...@mailinator.com

[Issue 977] Expressions inside a struct or array initializer get wrong line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=977 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 3995] Can't access array/AA from function literal defined inside the array/AA's initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3995 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsi...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 4426] assert(condition, string) fails in std.array.back

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4426 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy

Hi, I don't know if this is really a bug or some gotcha of the language that I don't get. I'm sorry if it happens to be the later. When I run this simple program class DispatchBase { auto opDispatch( string m, Args... )( Args args ) { writefln( Tried to call %s, m );

Re: opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy

On 2/1/2012 8:00 PM, Daniel L. Alves wrote: I don't know if this is really a bug or some gotcha of the language that I don't get. I'm sorry if it happens to be the later. This n.g. is mainly for bugzilla notifications. Questions like this should go into the digitalmars.D.learn n.g. But to

Re: opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy

There are some issues with mixing opDispatch and property syntax. Try: base.items().printValue( true ); This list is not for posting bug reports, it's just for bugzilla issues. Please post this kind of thing to d.learn or open a bug report at http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Daniel L. Alves

[Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4397 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@invisibleduck.org

[Issue 5367] Array of closures assign problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5367 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3389] gdb: using -gc is mandatory but not well documented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3389 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4932] Add opUnary() address-of support

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4932 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4149] refs displayed as pointers in gdb

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4149 --- Comment #15 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2012-02-01 21:03:43 PST --- Please stop cluttering this bug report with discussion about the meaning of -g, that's a solved problem. This report is about preserving 'ref'ness through the

[Issue 4044] [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4044] [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7416] 2.058 regression: fails to instantiate a constrained function template with a nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7416 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-01 21:20:39 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7416] 2.058 regression: fails to instantiate a constrained function template with a nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7416 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5448] Array of AAs literal doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5448 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 7419] [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5498] wrong common type deduction for array of classes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5498 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 7419] [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-01 22:00:23 PST --- Looking at that git commit, if I add back in the following code that was elided: 3450a3451,3459 #if 1 if (op==TOKconstruct this-e1-op==TOKvar

[Issue 5567] arrays can't call aliased functions as member functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5567 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4525] Regression(2.020) Array member call syntax can't find matches in current class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4525 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com ---

[Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 660] Incorrect protection error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=660 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #2 from Don

[Issue 7423] New: Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Summary: Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 CC|

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

  1   2   >