[Issue 5332] Undefined reference to zero length array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure, pull

[Issue 7323] ICE(glue.c): with json.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7323 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com

[Issue 1344] (D1 only) Can't implicitly convert literal 0 to typedef of ulong

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1344 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 1817] (D1 only) Lazy parameters cannot accept strings

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1817 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Issue 2192] Returning from inside foreach body delegate only returns from inner delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2192 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-02-03 04:48:55 PST --- I think the original issue titled Returning element in an AA of AAs during nested foreach generates compiler error is a dup of bug 3187, and today it works as

[Issue 2192] Returning from inside foreach body delegate only returns from inner delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2192 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Issue 3187] Nested foreach over opApply doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3187 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbkbbej...@mailinator.com

[Issue 7429] New: Cannot append a struct type to itself even if an opOpAssign(string op : ~) is defined.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7429 Summary: Cannot append a struct type to itself even if an opOpAssign(string op : ~) is defined. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 7430] New: opCmp doesn't support unordered value comparison.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430 Summary: opCmp doesn't support unordered value comparison. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2

[Issue 7430] opCmp doesn't support unordered value comparison.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 3771] warn or disallow method as property usage without @property attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3771 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7430] opCmp doesn't support unordered value comparison.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #5

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #12 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 14:42:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) For example, this should type check: immutable(int)[] arr = [2,3,4]; inout(const(int))[] foo(inout(int)[] x){

[Issue 7431] New: overload-resolution should be more fine-grained

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7431 Summary: overload-resolution should be more fine-grained Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 7432] New: dmd allows pure variables and treats pure like auto

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7432 Summary: dmd allows pure variables and treats pure like auto Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Issue 5575] Problem with a map() of a const uniq()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5575 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-03 15:41:44 PST --- This seems related, DMD 2.058head: import std.algorithm, std.array; void main() { auto s1 = hello; auto m1 = map!(c = c)(s1); auto a1 = array(m1); // OK

[Issue 7433] New: writeln of char range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7433 Summary: writeln of char range Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2012-02-03 15:46:53 PST --- Once again you are right Timon! I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call was id(foo(y)) instead of just id(y)! I sometimes cannot

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #14 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2012-02-03 15:59:19 PST --- Er... messed up that graph a smidge (In reply to comment #13) mutable ---+ | immutable --+--

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #16 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 16:26:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) Once again you are right Timon! I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call was id(foo(y)) instead of just id(y)! I sometimes

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #17 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2012-02-03 16:54:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #13) Once again you are right Timon! I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call

[Issue 2006] Appending empty array using ~= cast(T[]) [] doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Empty array literals with |Appending empty array

[Issue 7355] inout incorrectly resolved if the same type has both mutable and immutable parts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355 --- Comment #18 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 17:14:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #13) Once again you are right Timon! I was neglecting to see in the original example that

[Issue 6238] Cannot define global immutable AA

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx

[Issue 6238] Cannot define global immutable AA

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6238] Cannot define global immutable AA

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |All

[Issue 7434] Error involving array literal created in ctfe gives wrong line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|yebbl...@gmail.com |clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 6504] Regression(2.041): str ~ [arr] allows string literal to be modified

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6504 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-03 23:20:55 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7434] Error involving array literal created in ctfe gives wrong line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3812] Missing line number for implicit cast of variadic function to array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3812 --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-04 18:25:41 EST --- *** Issue 7434 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 2814] implicit cast (implemented via alias this) is not triggered when passing to function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2814 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3338] template is not an expression, of type void, and is not evaluatable at compile time combo error.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3338 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7363] Eponymous Template doesn't hide internal names in some cases with `static if`

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7363 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chadj...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 3451] (D1 only) Initializers don't work for tuple variables

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3451 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 4076] Wrong error line number with enum

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4076 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED