http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4076
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3451
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Platform|Other
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3338
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7363
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chadj...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from yebb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2814
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
--- Comment #2 from yebblies 2012-02-04 18:25:41 EST ---
*** Issue 7434 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6504
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-03 23:20:55 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5fd81965b2155abd6c5f8bbfcb9d7b1460a36b87
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-03 23:20:50 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/127d0110b839e5bdc2997ae0b586b1e93c7c8daa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7429
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
--- Comment #1 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|yebbl...@gmail.com |clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #2 from y
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |All
OS/Version|Windows
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
Summary: Error involving array literal created in ctfe gives
wrong line number
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7434
--- Comment #1 from yebblies 2012-02-04 18:03:18 EST ---
int[string] initHash(in string[] words) {
int[string] h;
for (auto i=0; i < words.length; i++) {
h[words[i]] = i; // Compiler points to this line and says
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238
--- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-02-03 22:54:32 PST ---
int[string] initHash(in string[] words) {
int[string] h;
for (auto i=0; i < words.length; i++) {
h[words[i]] = i; // Compiler points to this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from yebb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6238
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6545
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2547
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3 from yebblies 2012-02-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Appending empty array using |Empty array literals with
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #19 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
17:18:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > try at a minimum immutable, mutable, and inout. If more than one of these
> > typechecks, the call is ambiguous.
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #18 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 17:14:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (In reply to comment #13)
> > > Once again you are right Timon!
> > >
> > > I was neglecting to see in the original exa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Empty array literals with |Appending empty array using
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #17 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
16:54:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > Once again you are right Timon!
> >
> > I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call was id(foo(y
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #16 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 16:26:32 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Once again you are right Timon!
>
> I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call was id(foo(y))
> instead of just id(y)! I sometime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #15 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
16:04:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Er... messed up that graph a smidge
>
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > mutable ---+
> >|
> >
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #14 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
15:59:19 PST ---
Er... messed up that graph a smidge
(In reply to comment #13)
> mutable ---+
>|
> immutable --+--> inout(const) -+-> con
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
15:46:53 PST ---
Once again you are right Timon!
I was neglecting to see in the original example that the call was id(foo(y))
instead of just id(y)! I sometimes cannot penetrate your inadv
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5575
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-03 15:41:44 PST ---
This seems related, DMD 2.058head:
import std.algorithm, std.array;
void main() {
auto s1 = "hello";
auto m1 = map!(c => c)(s1);
auto a1 = array(m1); // OK
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7433
Summary: writeln of char range
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7431
Summary: overload-resolution should be more fine-grained
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7432
Summary: dmd allows pure variables and treats pure like auto
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #12 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-03 14:42:21 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > For example, this should type check:
> >
> > immutable(int)[] arr = [2,3,4];
> > inout(const(int))[] foo(inout(int)[] x
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #5 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
--- Comment #4 from Simen Kjaeraas 2012-02-03 12:57:09
PST ---
Oh, there is one problem - opEquals. If it returns true for ==, it returns
false for !=.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
--- Comment #2 from Gor Gyolchanyan 2012-02-03 11:52:59 PST
---
What i want is a floating-point style comparisons, where there's a NaN, which
fits perfectly in the comparison operators and really does return false in all
cases.
(In reply to c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Severity|blocke
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
Summary: opCmp doesn't support unordered value comparison.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7429
Summary: Cannot append a struct type to itself even if an
opOpAssign(string op : "~") is defined.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3187
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cbkbbej...@mailinator.com
--- Comment #5 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2012-02-03 04:48:55 PST ---
I think the original issue titled "Returning element in an AA of AAs during
nested foreach generates compiler error" is a dup of bug 3187, and today it
works as expected.
So, I can't u
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #11 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-02-03
03:24:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> For example, this should type check:
>
> immutable(int)[] arr = [2,3,4];
> inout(const(int))[] foo(inout(int)[] x){
> return uniform(0,2) ?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Platform|x86
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Summary|Empty array literals
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1817
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1344
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Platform|x86
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #35 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7323
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1064
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from yebblies 2012-02-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Comment #2 from Witold Baryluk 2012-02-03
01:31:54 PST ---
I belive this bug is almost fixed in compiler in repository. Is Phobos updated
accordingly to use @property property in array / string functions?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785
--- Comment #27 from Witold Baryluk 2012-02-03
01:09:31 PST ---
Just to add some additional context.
I think many CUDA and OpenCL compilers, as well some tools which uses
OpenGL/Cg, whetever, when asked to do double calculations actually uses
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=785
Witold Baryluk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5332
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure, pull
CC|
57 matches
Mail list logo
