http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7451
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1448
Kevin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@brogan.ca
--- Comment #7 from Kevin 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #12 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-07 19:06:25 PST ---
Ah, I didn't wanted to confuse here.
My example was a case for why Result could not be a static struct.
As such it shouldn't be default constructible.
David's example OTOH is a ca
Please report bugs to d.puremagic.com/issues. This list is not supposed to be
posted to directly by users. You sign up for it if you want to see all of the
updates to bugs on Bugzilla.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 15:49:19 Kevin Brogan wrote:
> ==
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7394
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
==
Bug:
--
1) Console output buffer is not flushed when it should be.
==
Example Code:
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright 2012-02-07
15:31:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> int base = 2;
> map!(a => a + base)(new int[](10));
>
> What we should do to solve this is to infer if a templated struct really needs
> a f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #10 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6332
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |pull
--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7452
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5076
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7452
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Function using enforce()|Function using enforce()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7459
Summary: working around nested function declaration order
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: spec
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7458
Summary: documentation claims non-existent limitation of nested
aggregate member functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7457
Summary: nested pure functions not specified
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456
Summary: Purity strength not documented
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: websites
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4854
--- Comment #15 from Jacob Carlborg 2012-02-07 04:21:38 PST ---
I (In reply to comment #14)
> Is anyone still running 10.5? That's two OSX versions ago.
I don't know. But I see now reason why we shouldn't support 10.5 as long as it
doesn't cau
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5915
--- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-02-07
02:04:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Where are you pasting the snippets of code? I'm using Opera (Win 7) and the
> text from http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_range.html is corre
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
--- Comment #15 from Don 2012-02-07 01:05:27 PST ---
So far my patch fixes the original bug report, and about 60% of Daniel's extra
test cases.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |normal
--
Configure issuemail: http:/
21 matches
Mail list logo
