http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-02-26 22:22:24 PST ---
Here's a link to the relevant part of the Unicode standard for whoever wants to
implement normalization:
http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/
Note that there are several differ
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2012-02-26
22:13:25 PST ---
The reason is straightforward - there's no point to it. Nested functions tend
to be right next to where they are used. They're not off in a separate file.
We shouldn't have feature
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2012-02-26
22:04:30 PST ---
The reason is straightforward - there's no point to it. Nested functions tend
to be right next to where they are used. They're not off in a separate file.
We shouldn't have feature
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7525
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-26 21:37:19 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/53b1a0461b485c1260514094e2164bd749f3f6d0
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7502
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7502
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-26 21:34:55 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/3f88f156879841ef79162916b2dbbf28e2a1fcc3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
Jesse Phillips changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7598
Summary: format() doesn't work with alias this
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Ph
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7471
--- Comment #6 from Jesse Phillips 2012-02-26
18:03:06 PST ---
After moving the regex to outside the loop and I think some other changes it
helped immensely. Declaring them as module variables didn't seem to gain any
more. I didn't have much t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7597
Summary: Statically disallow a init() method in structs
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: enhance
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-26 14:52:17 PST ---
*** Issue 7586 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7586
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3492
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7596
Summary: traits compiles can't detect non-copyable errors
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7595
Lukasz Wrzosek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luk.wrzo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7595
Summary: Data being overwritten.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4814
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7554
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-26 10:58:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think making inner() pure isn't necessary.
In this program I want inner() to be pure.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/us
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #20 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-26 10:30:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > That assumption is bogus, because this is almost never the case.
> > It makes contract programming basically unusable.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #19 from Stewart Gordon 2012-02-26 09:15:32 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> That assumption is bogus, because this is almost never the case.
> It makes contract programming basically unusable. Such a strong
> weakening of th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7590
Trass3r changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #18 from deadalnix 2012-02-26 08:46:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Don's proposal is to remove 'in' contract widening completely. That does not
> make a lot of sense to me.
Don's proposal is similar to what you reported her
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5304
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Platform|x86
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7594
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from yebblies 2012-02-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7592
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from yebbli
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7593
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from yebblies 2012-02-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4155
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D1 & D2
--- Comment #2 from yebblies 2012-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7581
--- Comment #2 from yebblies 2012-02-27 03:37:39 EST ---
New pull
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/769
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7591
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from yebblies 2012-02-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5625
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #17 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-26 08:30:09 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > There is no "B's in". That is the point. The bug is that an implicit 'in'
> > contract that always passes is added to B.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584
--- Comment #5 from deadalnix 2012-02-26 08:28:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> LSP is not violated. That is the point. The rules proposed here are sufficient
> to guarantee LSP. The rules that are currently employed are too conservative.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7500
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, pull
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7594
Summary: xmm ops use actual addition/subtraction when
evaluating real+imaginary
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keyw
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7554
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012-02-26 08:23:38 PST ---
I think making inner() pure isn't necessary.
Following raises no error and works as expected.
T outer(T)(T function(in T) pure foo) pure {
int inner() {
return foo(5);
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7593
Summary: cfloat to cdouble conversion is broken when using xmm
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584
--- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-26 08:17:35 PST ---
LSP is not violated. That is the point. The rules proposed here are sufficient
to guarantee LSP. The rules that are currently employed are too conservative.
Think about it.
void
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7592
Summary: Conversion from ireal to ifloat broken when using xmm
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7591
Summary: Wrong const-folding comparisons involving complex nans
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7590
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-02-26 07:57:46 PST ---
D parser simply ignores almost of unnecessary last comma in list like follows.
enum E { A = 0, B, C, } // last comma is ignored
void func(int x, int y, ){} // last comma is ignored
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #16 from deadalnix 2012-02-26 07:43:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> There is no "B's in". That is the point. The bug is that an implicit 'in'
> contract that always passes is added to B.foo.
Yes that is the point. As no cont
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7585
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from K
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7590
--- Comment #1 from Trass3r 2012-02-26 16:35:38 CET ---
NB: The problem is B isn't defined.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584
--- Comment #3 from deadalnix 2012-02-26 07:35:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Again, give an example. Your claim is not true.
In Foo, you sated, by contract, that the function must return 0. Any piece of
code using an object of type Foo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7590
Summary: no error with missing template parameter
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7471
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Olshansky 2012-02-26
06:32:30 PST ---
Anyway how compares of 2.056-2.058 when you don't create regex objects inside
tight loop?
It is a strange thing to do at any circumstances, even N-slot caching you pay
some extra
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #15 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-26 05:11:34 PST ---
There is no "B's in". That is the point. The bug is that an implicit 'in'
contract that always passes is added to B.foo.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/u
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584
--- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-26 05:03:25 PST ---
Again, give an example. Your claim is not true.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
deadalnix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deadal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584
deadalnix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deadal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7563
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from K
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7589
Summary: __traits(compiles) does not work with a template that
fails to compile
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7525
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
Summary|Bro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7471
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Olshansky 2012-02-26
02:22:02 PST ---
Profiling shows that about 99% of time is spent in GC, ouch.
What's at work here is that new regex engine is more costly to create and
allocates a bunch of structures on heap. Th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7582
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
58 matches
Mail list logo
