[Issue 8264] [std.conv.to] constructing conversion doesn't work with alias this

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8264 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-06-18 23:16:52 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Is it really bug? Yes. The problem is that declaring alias this is incorrectly matches more than two templates. If you remove 'alias wrap

[Issue 8264] [std.conv.to] constructing conversion doesn't work with alias this

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8264 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #3

[Issue 8237] Error message with _error_ when using failed type inference in template parameter

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8237 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 8265] New: Pseudo member function not found when called across modules

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8265 Summary: Pseudo member function not found when called across modules Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652 --- Comment #18 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-06-19 06:10:15 PDT --- How about? Sounds great. It doesn't break code and allows us to fix this finally. foreach (i, item; array) Yeah, it should apply to the index variable as well. -- Configure

[Issue 8266] New: Calling a function in pseudo-member syntax fails to deduce template argument type that uses alias this

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8266 Summary: Calling a function in pseudo-member syntax fails to deduce template argument type that uses alias this Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All

[Issue 8261] std.traits.ParameterTypeTuple may break existing codes

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8261 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 7067] std.random.RandomSample and RandomCover are poorly designed

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7067 jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de ---

[Issue 7067] std.random.RandomSample and RandomCover are poorly designed

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7067 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8267] New: called template only instantiated once with foreach over expression type tuple

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8267 Summary: called template only instantiated once with foreach over expression type tuple Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly.

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2043 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #7

[Issue 8268] New: std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 Summary: std.datetime unittest asserts Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-06-19 11:16:21 PDT --- Maybe they were idiots and changed the behavior of some API. Bleh. Well, this will be fun to deal with given that I don't have Windows 8. It wouldn't

[Issue 8269] New: The 'with' statement does not observe temporary object lifetime

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8269 Summary: The 'with' statement does not observe temporary object lifetime Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 8269] The 'with' statement does not observe temporary object lifetime

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8269 Ali Cehreli acehr...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure