On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 16:27:29 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
Direct replying to this news group/mailing list is no meaning.
You must post these test case from the form in bugzilla.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Kenji hara
2012/6/25 Max Samukha :
Another test case. The error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
--- Comment #1 from Max Samukha 2012-07-02 23:33:55
PDT ---
Test case 1:
string foo()
{
string s = "ab";
return s[0 .. $];
}
template T2(string s)
{
}
template T1()
{
enum s = foo();
alias T2!(s) t2;
}
int bar()
{
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4498
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4498
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
Severi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339
Summary: is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due
to nested function error
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2012-07-02 21:01:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Maybe. But I'm not completely convinced that it would break all that much code
> - particularly since I would have expected any code using Unqual to be writte
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-02 20:03:22
PDT ---
Maybe. But I'm not completely convinced that it would break all that much code
- particularly since I would have expected any code using Unqual to be written
with the intention o
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-07-02 19:41:54 PDT ---
> But, changing its implementation would break *maby* existing codes, so,
s/maby/many/
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are r
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012-0
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
Summary: Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8185
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
ponce changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alil...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from ponce 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8335
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8335
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2012-07-02 09:27:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is definitely a bug, but is really *regression*?
> I'd like to know the version of dmd which had worked correctly.
Ah, OK. I found the reason of this bu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8335
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-07-02 08:58:44 PDT ---
This is definitely a bug, but is really *regression*?
I'd like to know the version of dmd which had worked correctly.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara 2012-07-02 08:37:57 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Reduced test-case:
> ---
> struct S
> {
> string str;
> uint unused1, unused2 = 0;
> }
>
> auto f(alias fun)()
> {
> struct Result
> {
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3646
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pun...@coverify.org
--- Comment #10
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
--- Comment #2 from Puneet Goel 2012-07-02 05:32:59 PDT
---
> Default arguments were never reliable for functions called trough a pointer,
> so
> this little change is expected, take a look at the changelog of 2.060alpha.
I think it would be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
Summary: Default function parameters ignored by delegate
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8335
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8335
Summary: DMD ignoring ref for array arguments
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7579
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|disa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7579
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4936
Bernard Helyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blood.of.l...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965
--- Comment #5 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-07-02
12:43:33 MSD ---
Reduced test-case:
---
struct S
{
string str;
uint unused1, unused2 = 0;
}
auto f(alias fun)()
{
struct Result
{
S s;
this(S _s) { s = _s; }
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965
--- Comment #4 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-07-02
12:15:37 MSD ---
I think this bug may be fixed when `std.algorithm` will work.
Example mentioned in this issue description (now fails):
---
import std.array;
import std.algorithm;
void main()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5926
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
29 matches
Mail list logo
