[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Denis Shelomovskij changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFI

[Issue 8362] std.traits.isSafe doesn't work with unsafe lamdba functions

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-08 22:10:46 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/675 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Issue 6329] Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6329 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 20:20:02 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/5cc381c00dc0fca33850e424ba9a0c1e13

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 20:16:53 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/6203835e5d699f7a37c16625db0776870

[Issue 1824] Object not const correct

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 --- Comment #17 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 19:39:59 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/271085b2d368b5b3046ef95798ae9aec50ab148

[Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-08 18:07:14 PDT --- Actually, I left some extra cruft in that example. The actual example is import std.traits; struct S{ auto fun() { return 1; } } void main() { auto s1 = S(); static assert

[Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 8362] New: safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 Summary: safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: nor

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #75 from David Piepgrass 2012-07-08 17:05:28 PDT --- > > I must say, I would be entirely opposed to fixing this "bug". As far as I > > can > > see, the arguments of Timon and deadalnix have been entirely theoretical, > > It is ir

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #74 from Stewart Gordon 2012-07-08 15:59:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #72) > (In reply to comment #70) >> // BTW I wanted to use an interface here, but I get >> // "missing body { ... } after in or out" >> // and then if I add a

[Issue 8274] thread_attachThis only works for main thread

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8274 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #73 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-08 15:08:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > > P.S. Besides which, the implementation difficulties mentioned by Walter in > comment 58 are really big difficulties, that don't seem worth it for w

[Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-08 15:04:14 PDT --- A related case shown in D.learn (reduced): import std.stdio: writeln; void main() { immutable int[] A = [1]; int[A.length] B; writeln(A); writeln(B); } DM

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #72 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-08 14:58:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > I must say, I would be entirely opposed to fixing this "bug". As far as I can > see, the arguments of Timon and deadalnix have been entirely theoretic

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #71 from deadalnix 2012-07-08 14:50:57 PDT --- The error is in the fact that addAll isn't aware of B. You can solve that easily with metaprograming, or by overloading addAll for B. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/i

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 David Piepgrass changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qwertie...@gmail.com --- Comment #70

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 14:03:31 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/b7bdcdce294729e48b56fa5d8feca

[Issue 4809] Stack trace when throwing exception misses location of the throw statement

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4809 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:51:50 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/80625a2fc87a830aa538f2f5857901

[Issue 5547] Improve assert to give information on values given to it when it fails

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5547 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:46:35 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/17db389925581804a3d6d8a101917

[Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3309] `Traits` : function parameters name

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3309 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:38:34 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/

[Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 12:36:55 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0a612679713182d571f9eaa140dc93451c623d0

[Issue 8361] New: [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8361 Summary: [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8360] Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8360 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 8360] New: Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8360 Summary: Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 3031] scoped static var conflicts while linking

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3031 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch, wrong-code |link-failure CC|

[Issue 8351] Lambdas in 'static foreach' give errors

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8351 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 5655] Lambda inside static foreach saves wrong value of counter

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5655 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wfunct...@hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from y

[Issue 8359] New: std.stdio.write(ln) segmentation faults

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8359 Summary: std.stdio.write(ln) segmentation faults Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Issue 8358] New: TypeInfo_Const next implementation is wrong

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8358 Summary: TypeInfo_Const next implementation is wrong Product: D Version: D1 & D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2