On Monday, 24 September 2012 at 16:49:55 UTC,
bearophile_h...@eml.cc wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8714
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||CTFE, diagnostic, pull
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6873
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-25 01:28:49 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3091
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-25 01:28:44 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8722
Summary: foreach triggers a floating point exception with
multidimensional array of a dimension equal to 0
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8722
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Crouzet blo...@hotmail.com 2012-09-25
02:10:09 PDT ---
Did I really write too be...? Where's the edit button!? :)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8722
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-09-25 03:51:40
PDT ---
It has to do with naming unittest blacks, which is related both to stack traces
and to calling unittest blocks independently.
Recently, it _was_ fixed so
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #3 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2012-09-25 04:04:14 PDT ---
But since unittests now have the line number in its name this issue is only
concerned having the ability to call individual unittests. Right? Because now
you can tell from
Hello
I'm having serious problems with Access Violation to create
programs that make use of C DLLs in DMD 2060. After all,
integration with DLLs in C DMD is fully functional?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
Summary: Error: function called with argument types:
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Raphael Basso:
I'm having serious problems with Access Violation to create
programs that make use of C DLLs in DMD 2060. After all,
integration with DLLs in C DMD is fully functional?
Try asking in D.learn, and to give more infomation.
Bye,
bearophile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836
--- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-25 06:12:56 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
Hello to all. I want to discuss immutable and const constructors.
For a start let's write the simple class with two constructors:
class A
{
int x;
this() immutable
{
x = 42;
}
this()
{
x = 13;
}
}
Well, dmd passes this code, but what if we want to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3091
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 06:44:15 PDT ---
Fix for language reference:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/issues/159
--
Configure issuemail:
Ask in D.learn or in other forums. This forum is only a mirror of
discussing issues from D bugzilla which is mistakenly opened for
posting.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6873
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 06:43:16 PDT ---
Fix for language reference:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/issues/159
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 06:51:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Now compiling this code:
struct Foo {
this(int) nothrow { // line 2
throw new Exception(something);
}
}
void main()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8724
Summary: Throwing exception in constructor prints strange
warning
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 06:56:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Could you also check that a nothrow constructor can still throw
an Error please?
From related:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150
--- Comment #8 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 07:04:01 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #5)
Could you also check that a nothrow constructor can still throw
an Error please?
From related:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-09-25 09:37:58
PDT ---
It makes it so that having named unittest blocks is less critical for stack
traces, but having actual names for them would still me quite a bit better (it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-09-25 11:37:57 PDT
---
By the way, following code is not compiled either (for the same reason):
struct S;
struct S {}
void main()
{
}
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-09-25 11:35:45 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why is that clearly a bug? You gave two functions with identical function
signatures. The only time that you give function prototypes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6946
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-09-25 13:10:26
PDT ---
And why on earth would you _need_ a prototype? This isn't C. We're not forced
to declare functions higher up in a file before using them. Ideally, prototypes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8651
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-25 16:34:27 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8651
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725
Summary: segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in
module-level regex
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725
--- Comment #1 from Val Markovic v...@markovic.io 2012-09-25 22:33:03 PDT ---
Oh, and the segfault goes away if I put the regex creation directly in the
call, like so:
writeln( replace( input, regex( r\*
36 matches
Mail list logo
