http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4272
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-10-07 01:08:41 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
The problem is that UFCS was made to work with functions and typeof is not a
function. Accepting
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8773
Summary: [CTFE] foreach ref element doesn't work well at
compile time.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
Summary: 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #1 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 04:24:24
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1146)
.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1146|.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
Summary: 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #3 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 05:00:53
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1148)
output_d.d
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
--- Comment #2 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 05:01:13
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1149)
output_d.d
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8771
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #4 from Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-10-07 14:19:57
CEST ---
What's happening is that pthread_join() is giving us ESRCH because the thread
handle is apparently no longer valid.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
--- Comment #28 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-07 05:48:44 PDT ---
struct Foo {
protected void bar() {}
}
void main() {}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6036
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-07 05:51:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
It is still a corner case of language spec, but I think it is an expected
behavior.
Because, the operator overloading mechanism just consider
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|druntime|DMD
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
--- Comment #4 from Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-10-07 15:02:30
CEST ---
FWIW, changing the foreach loop to a for loop makes the code run (presumably
correctly; I didn't actually look at what it's supposed to do).
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #5 from Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-10-07 15:11:18
CEST ---
Something is very wrong here and I'm not sure whether to blame the compiler or
Phobos:
starting 0 7FCE6E0B3E00
joining 0 7FCE6E0B3D00
First value is the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
--- Comment #5 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 07:37:56
PDT ---
Perhaps worth noting that this code compiles and runs fine using ldc2 compiled
from the Git repository.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #6 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 07:44:02
PDT ---
Perhaps worth noting that using ldc2 compiled from the Git repository gives
effectively the same result.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
--- Comment #6 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 07:40:51
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
FWIW, changing the foreach loop to a for loop makes the code run (presumably
correctly; I didn't actually look at what it's supposed
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6336
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-10-07 09:15:00 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6216
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-10-07 09:15:13 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5481
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-10-07 09:44:16 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4596
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-10-07 10:27:24 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8251
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-10-07 10:59:50 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6036
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7603
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4838
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6216
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6336
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6174
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5481
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7274
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8251
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3733
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7174
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blo...@hotmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6174
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-07 13:01:14 PDT ---
This is an improvement of D.
std.algorithm.copy can't be used to initialize const array fields, but this is
not important:
import std.algorithm: copy;
class Foo {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6174
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-07 13:12:27 PDT ---
Is this expected? Do you want me to put this in a new bug report?
struct Foo {
int[1] bar;
}
const Foo[1] foos;
static this() {
foreach (i; 0 .. foos.length)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8777
Summary: final fields in error messages
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7603
--- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-07
14:04:47 PDT ---
I've just realized I shot myself in the foot with this change (well,
partially).
Direct snippet of some code I've used (the main thing to look for is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8683
--- Comment #4 from Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu 2012-10-07
17:51:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Maybe typeof(Foo!()) is required here?
That does work, but I don't see why
pragma(msg, typeof(Foo));
should fail while
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8778
Summary: Struct with core.simd type has wrong size and gives
Segmentation fault
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
43 matches
Mail list logo
