http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8950
Summary: postblit not called on const static array
initialization
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8942
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8937
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8951
Summary: static array of context pointer struct s fails:
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8952
Summary: nested structs with conext pointers fail
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8951
--- Comment #1 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-11-03 03:02:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Creating a static array of structs that have a context pointer is not
supported:
Simpler example:
import std.stdio;
//
void main()
{
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
Summary: Parser rejects qualifier after destructor i.e.
`~this() qualifier { }`
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8954
Summary: Missing line number in error message for uncollable
destructor/postblit
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8940
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-03 05:09:50 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5314
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8940
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8926
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malteskaru...@web.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8906
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8955
Summary: Can't have qualified field with not-qualified
constructor/postblit
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8951
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8952
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8956
Summary: Ability to break typesystem with
constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify
immutable)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4867
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652
--- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-03 07:06:12 PDT ---
See also:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/znbtczbgipqqzllaf...@forum.dlang.org
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8957
Summary: Closure not recognized when passing type with
post-blit as lazy parameter
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8955
--- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-03
17:25:18 MSK ---
Partial workaround:
For const/immutable postblit/dtor:
---
struct S
{
private void myPostblit() { }
this(this) inout
{ (cast(S*)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8956
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||8958
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
Summary: [RFC] Make constructors/postblits/destructors work
correctly with const/immutable qualifiers
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8959
Summary: IsExpression should support syntax which has no
Identifier in all cases
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8057
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8067
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
--- Comment #2 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-03
14:09:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Ever heard of slicing an array in D?
Check this out: http://dlang.org/d-array-article.html
Dig down in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8057
--- Comment #4 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-04
00:13:50 MSK ---
(In reply to comment #3)
S's destructor is incorrect, as you always can set `S s = S.init`...
And also because of `destroy` existance.
This
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-11-03
14:18:25 PDT ---
Ok, my argument wasn’t worth it I agree. But, why any would use such a
function
where a simple loop and a test will do it?
Because find is a simple
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
--- Comment #4 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-03
14:35:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Ok, my argument wasn’t worth it I agree. But, why any would use such a
function
where a simple loop and a test will do it?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8926
--- Comment #2 from Malte Skarupke malteskaru...@web.de 2012-11-03 14:35:27
PDT ---
Sorry for posting a duplicate, but that other bug was closed, so obviously I
couldn't find it. Well the bug still exists, but I guess somebody wrote a patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6101
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
--- Comment #6 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-03
16:45:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
...
There’s a popFront() function, so why would it be the correct way to search?
Reusing a «
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
--- Comment #8 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-11-03 17:38:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
...
The issue is: a function that is designed to « search » for something is
excepted to return a boolean, not top popFront() [...] and returns the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
39 matches
Mail list logo