[Issue 9072] New: some tests from the dmd test suite actually test the library, not the compiler

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9072 Summary: some tests from the dmd test suite actually test the library, not the compiler Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 9073] New: In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9073 Summary: In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9073 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012

[Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065 --- Comment #10 from David Nadlinger 2012-11-25 01:19:38 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > std.traits operates on types, so I would not expect isSomeFunction!bar to ever > work. You need to pass it a type. That's how everything in that module

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 2012-11-25 01:51:06 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > I am not sure what you are trying to do here. Anyways, the following should > work: > > template PropertyTypeOf(alias prop) { > alias PropertyTypeOf =

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Com

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 --- Comment #2 from Robert Schadek 2012-11-25 04:53:18 PST --- where do you want the examples. it is pretty long 270 lines. The problem is a combination of the way opSlice doesn't require a specific return type and. the recursive nature of sor

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|monarchdo...@gmail.com

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 --- Comment #4 from Robert Schadek 2012-11-25 05:54:40 PST --- http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/163a9600 prints the exact same error thanks -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

[Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 --- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-11-25 07:30:14 PST --- OK, what you showed me was that indeed, "deque" is not "sliceable" according to the new definition. It does also show that there are some issues in sort's implementation that

[Issue 9074] New: Can't use range functions with Appender

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9074 Summary: Can't use range functions with Appender Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 9075] New: core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9075 Summary: core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Issue 9076] New: Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9076 Summary: Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects

[Issue 9076] Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9076 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012

[Issue 9075] core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9075 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 9077] New: Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9077 Summary: Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW S

[Issue 9078] New: non-static opCall is chosen instead of a default constructor

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9078 Summary: non-static opCall is chosen instead of a default constructor Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 9079] New: 'delete this' no longer compiles

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9079 Summary: 'delete this' no longer compiles Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 9080] New: DMD compile ambiguous code or doesn’t even warn

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9080 Summary: DMD compile ambiguous code or doesn’t even warn Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 9078] non-static opCall is chosen instead of a default constructor

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9078 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 9080] Reject effect-free assignment

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9080 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch Summary

[Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash

2012-11-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8596 --- Comment #22 from deadalnix 2012-11-25 21:56:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) > I've tried various schemes to induce it to fail, and done a code review. I > can't find anything wrong. I need a test case. Sorry for being unavailable the